School Board evaluates Lexia program usage and budget discrepancies

The LSR7 Finance Committee convened on May 12, 2025, to discuss various educational programs and budgetary considerations impacting local schools. The meeting focused on the use of educational resources and the financial implications of different licensing options.

The session began with a discussion about the utilization of Title I funds across three designated buildings. It was noted that while two buildings are actively using external programs, the third has opted for in-house interventions tailored to their specific needs. This flexibility allows each building to develop its own plan and allocate funds accordingly, which may include staffing or other support mechanisms.

A key point of discussion arose regarding the licensing costs associated with the Lexia program. One building was found to have 225 individual licenses, which appeared to be more expensive than a building-wide license option. Committee members questioned whether it would be more cost-effective for the school to switch to the building-wide license, potentially saving around $8,000. The response indicated that the decision to maintain individual licenses was based on specific grade-level needs, and further investigation into the cost discrepancies was promised.

Following this, Dr. Mathis presented a renewal proposal for the N2Y program, which supports core academic instruction for life skills programs. This program also includes SymbolStix, a tool used by special education teachers to create visual supports for students requiring additional behavioral assistance.

The meeting continued with Dr. Shelton addressing the Lexia licensing issue, confirming that Lisa Mon Elementary is using the program selectively at certain grade levels. Despite the higher per-license cost, it was determined that this approach remains financially beneficial compared to a building-wide license.

Lastly, Dr. Carlson introduced the renewal of the Network for Educator Effectiveness (NEI), a tool developed in partnership with the University of Missouri. This program supports classroom observations and professional development for educators, although it will see a slight price increase.

In conclusion, the Finance Committee's discussions highlighted the importance of tailored educational strategies and the financial considerations that accompany them. The committee plans to follow up on the licensing inquiries and continue evaluating the effectiveness of the programs in place.