Thetis Medder reports David Smith for forgery in park project memo scandal

May 12, 2025 | Dallas, Dallas County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Thetis Medder reports David Smith for forgery in park project memo scandal
In a recent meeting of the Dallas Ethics Advisory Commission, a significant case involving the Department of Park and Recreation was discussed, highlighting serious ethical concerns within city operations. The case centers around a complaint filed by Thetis Medder, an office assistant, against David Smith, an area manager in the same department.

The issue arose from a memorandum Smith sent out regarding a project at Willie Mae Butler Park in East Dallas, which involved replacing playground wood chips. Medder alleged that Smith forged her signature on the memo without her consent, falsely stating that the city would need 360 cubic yards of material when only 230 were necessary. This misrepresentation raised alarms about the integrity of city operations and the trust placed in public officials.

Medder took immediate action upon discovering the forgery, reporting it to the city manager's office ethics officer, which led to an investigation by the Office of Inspector General. Smith later amended the memo to correct the district designation but continued to face scrutiny for his actions.

During the hearing, the commission reviewed the ethical implications of Smith's behavior, emphasizing the importance of integrity and public trust in city officials. The commission is considering two ethics charges against Smith: one for failing to conduct himself with integrity and another for not considering the public perception of his actions.

The outcome of this hearing could have significant implications for the management of city projects and the accountability of public officials in Dallas. As the commission deliberates, residents are left to ponder the importance of ethical conduct in local government and its impact on community trust. The case serves as a reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in public service, ensuring that city employees act in the best interest of the community they serve.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI