Reproductive health care providers in Nevada are facing an alarming surge in harassment and violence, prompting urgent calls for legislative protection. During a recent Senate Committee on Government Affairs meeting, advocates presented Assembly Bill 235, which aims to shield these providers from threats by allowing them to keep their home addresses confidential.

The bill's proponents, including representatives from Planned Parenthood, highlighted a staggering increase in reported incidents of stalking and threats against abortion providers—rising between 200% to 900% since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. "Our health care workers should not be put in a position where their lives are in danger simply for doing their jobs," stated Erica Roth, a key advocate for the bill.

Alexis Elise, interim director of Planned Parenthood Votes Nevada, emphasized the need for this legislation, citing a hostile political climate that has made providing reproductive health care increasingly dangerous. She detailed instances of harassment faced by staff, including doxxing—where personal information is publicly released to facilitate harassment. "This bill will allow current provisions for fictitious addresses to extend to reproductive health care providers in Nevada," Elise explained.

The proposed legislation seeks to expand existing protections that allow certain public officials to keep their addresses confidential, now including abortion and gender-affirming care providers. This move is seen as essential not only for the safety of health care workers but also for ensuring continued access to vital services in a state where public support for reproductive rights remains strong.

However, the bill has faced opposition from groups like Nevada Right to Life and the Nevada Republican Party, who argue that protections should be extended to all individuals, regardless of their stance on reproductive health. Critics contend that the bill creates a biased framework favoring one side of a contentious debate.

As the committee deliberates, the outcome of AB 235 could significantly impact the safety and operational environment for reproductive health care providers in Nevada, reflecting broader national tensions surrounding reproductive rights. Advocates urge swift passage of the bill to affirm the state's commitment to protecting those who provide essential health services amidst rising threats.