The Senate Committee on Government Affairs convened on May 9, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 235, aimed at enhancing protections for reproductive health care providers in Nevada. The bill seeks to address the alarming rise in harassment and violence faced by these professionals, particularly following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, which has reportedly led to a staggering increase in threats and stalking incidents.

During the meeting, Assemblymember Erica Roth presented the bill, emphasizing the urgent need for protective measures as reports of harassment have surged by 200 to 900%. Roth highlighted the disturbing trend of doxxing, where personal information of health care providers is publicly shared to incite harassment. The proposed legislation would allow these providers to petition for their home addresses to be kept confidential, thereby safeguarding their personal safety.

Alexis Solis, interim executive director of Planned Parenthood Votes Nevada, supported the bill, noting that the political climate has made the work of reproductive health care providers increasingly dangerous. She detailed various incidents of intimidation faced by staff, including threats and aggressive confrontations while gathering signatures for initiatives. Solis argued that the bill is essential for ensuring that health care providers can perform their duties without fear for their safety.

The committee also heard from several supporters, including representatives from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Nevada Coalition to End Domestic Violence, who underscored the importance of protecting health care providers to ensure continued access to essential services.

However, opposition to the bill was voiced by representatives from Nevada Right to Life and the Nevada Republican Party, who argued that the legislation unfairly prioritizes certain health care providers while neglecting the safety of those with opposing views. They called for a more inclusive approach to privacy protections that would extend to all individuals facing harassment, regardless of their stance on reproductive health issues.

The committee's discussions highlighted the complex and contentious nature of reproductive health care in Nevada, reflecting broader national debates. As the meeting concluded, the committee members were urged to consider the implications of the bill not only for health care providers but also for the overall political and social climate surrounding reproductive rights in the state. The next steps for AB 235 will involve further deliberation and potential amendments as the committee weighs the concerns raised during the session.