The Senate Committee on Government Affairs convened on May 9, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 301, which proposes increased compensation for trustees of General Improvement Districts (GIDs) across Nevada. The meeting featured a series of public testimonies, predominantly opposing the bill.

Several callers expressed concerns regarding the financial management of GIDs, particularly highlighting the Incline Village General Improvement District, which is currently under fiscal watch due to a significant cash shortage exceeding $700,000. Testimonies emphasized that rewarding trustees with higher salaries amid financial mismanagement would be inappropriate. One caller stated, "If they have an issue with money missing, no one should be rewarded," reflecting a common sentiment among those who spoke against the bill.

Opponents argued that the proposed salary increases would ultimately burden taxpayers, as the funding for these raises would come from local taxes. Many speakers pointed out that the current compensation for trustees is already adequate and that public service should not be driven by financial gain. One resident remarked, "You should only get rewarded when you do a good job, not a bad job."

While the majority of testimonies were in opposition, a few individuals expressed neutral positions, suggesting that the bill allows local districts to make their own decisions regarding compensation. Jim Degraffenried, a vice chairman of a GID, noted that he ran for his position to serve the community rather than for financial incentives, and he would not support a significant pay increase for trustees.

The committee concluded the hearing without a definitive decision, leaving the future of Assembly Bill 301 uncertain. The discussions highlighted ongoing concerns about fiscal responsibility and the role of public service in Nevada's local governance.