The Zoning Advisory Board of Henry County convened on May 8, 2025, to discuss a conditional use request for a group home located at 2063 Panola Road. This request had previously been approved but was sent back for re-evaluation due to concerns regarding public notice compliance.

The property, currently zoned as residential agricultural (RA), is proposed to serve as a group home for up to ten children aged 12 to 17 who are in state custody due to abuse or neglect. Angela Hannon, the applicant, emphasized that the home would provide a supervised environment with staff present at all times, ensuring no disturbance to neighbors. The property spans over five acres, allowing for the necessary space as stipulated by the Unified Land Development Code, which mandates that group homes must be located on a minimum of two acres and outside of subdivisions.

During the meeting, Hannon addressed the board, stating her commitment to maintaining the property and complying with all regulations. She clarified that this would not be her first group home, as she has experience in the field, although she currently does not own any active facilities.

Support for the proposal was voiced by Anne Fields, a former foster parent, who highlighted the importance of such programs for youth in need. However, opposition was also significant, with several residents expressing concerns about the impact of the group home on their community. Mildred Schmels and Polly Lawton articulated worries about the increasing number of group homes in the area, arguing that it detracts from the neighborhood's quality and property values. Karen Jacobs echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for high-quality development that aligns with the community's growth trajectory.

Kaylin Santos Mendoza, a resident living adjacent to the proposed site, shared a personal narrative about her family's pursuit of a safe and stable home, expressing fears that the group home could jeopardize their peace and security.

The board allowed time for public comments both in favor of and against the proposal, reflecting a community divided on the issue. As discussions concluded, the board members deliberated on the implications of the conditional use request, weighing the need for supportive housing against community concerns.

The meeting underscored the complexities of zoning decisions, particularly regarding group homes, and highlighted the ongoing dialogue between community development and social services in Henry County. The board's decision on the conditional use request remains pending, with further discussions anticipated in future meetings.