In a gripping afternoon session of the 187th District Court on May 9, 2025, the trial of the State vs. Rendon took a dramatic turn as video evidence and eyewitness testimonies were scrutinized. Central to the case is the incident involving a security guard's use of force against a patron, Pablo, who was allegedly involved in a violent altercation at a local establishment.

The court heard from a key witness who detailed the number of surveillance cameras in the venue, revealing that only one video was turned over to the police, which depicted the moment Rendon allegedly kneed Pablo in the stomach. The witness admitted that despite having 14 to 16 cameras, the footage was limited and poorly recorded, leading to questions about the thoroughness of the evidence provided to law enforcement.

Rendon, who is facing charges of aggravated assault with serious bodily injury, defended his actions by claiming he was acting to protect himself and others from a perceived threat. He stated, “I had to stop a tragedy from happening,” emphasizing that he believed he was justified in using force against Pablo, who he claimed was reaching for a weapon during the chaos.

However, the prosecution challenged Rendon's narrative, highlighting inconsistencies in his statements. They pointed out that he failed to mention the use of force or the presence of a weapon in conversations with police and witnesses immediately following the incident. The prosecution argued that Rendon's actions were excessive and not in line with the responsibilities of a licensed security officer.

As the trial progresses, the court will continue to examine the implications of the video evidence and the testimonies surrounding the incident. The outcome could have significant repercussions for Rendon, as well as for the standards of conduct expected from security personnel in similar establishments. The case underscores the complexities of self-defense claims in the context of public safety and the legal responsibilities of those tasked with maintaining order.