[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6567928,"mediaKeyId","3241544-363e2b915a2840f661b58fa8cb36145e","parentId",3241544,"title","Residents raise bike‑trail speed limit and parcel‑split questions during Hooper planning commission public comment","audioSeconds",220,"startMs",773000,"endMs",993000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3241544-363e2b915a2840f661b58fa8cb36145e&start=773&end=993","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3241544-363e2b915a2840f661b58fa8cb36145e/thumbnail_773000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6567928/Utah/Residents-raise-biketrail-speed-limit-and-parcelsplit-questions-during-Hooper-planning-commission-public-comment","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6567928-a84e5df8ead02a195bb375c9c4fc8ac4/orig.mp4?Expires=1770516808&Signature=VZEbOzom12JaQ9SLnmf0OXqwmlD5bd2NfevBmVDLiDxAupDZIpEkKgbZi2tNfBTnvbabJ5TlmQHde-cHKq4lrWUsCrw-PZz9kVEgpeVYL4cIJZJqBHL0FKh45GrdM9Xaa6UysIV87bJqsWvdEMar8ZQn45jPOTdxThHrpgKZkQVd7ARD0PPlSb9Zvuk3kuK7yyamXssdD7yXGXAfikTqVzsg5LBuMxgZ0RHrrnEtB4~mBlu-NAR0f1vwM1gx1m-fGfwhDWrogRyvpYtwo~mPWsN~o9N3bBIn2pQDjGQg7N26QgHMUdrBO0Q~9ERnBiLQT4S-5twmRU5hlQKBtbXihA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Hooper City","date","2025-05-09T01:23:33Z","article","During the May 8 Hooper Planning Commission meeting public comment period, speakers raised two separate concerns: setting a speed limit for a local bike trail and the process and constraints for splitting a privately held parcel.

One resident requested the commission consider a speed limit for the city bike trail to address safety concerns about speeding bicycles and mixed users. The speaker did not specify a proposed speed limit; the comment was recorded as a public‑comment request for the commission to consider safety measures for the trail.

A second speaker identified themselves as a property owner near 4000 South and 5350 and said they own an approximately one‑acre R‑1 parcel and are exploring splitting it into two parcels. The resident said sewer and water are available at the site and asked whether the future land‑use map designation of 0.75 acre would allow a smaller lot or whether rezoning was required. The resident said family history and school proximity factor into their plans.

Planning staff responded that the existing zoning (R‑1) governs current lot rules and that a smaller lot would generally require rezoning or a general plan amendment to alter the future land‑use map. Staff suggested one alternative: an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), which would add a second dwelling on the lot without subdividing into separate parcels. Staff noted ADU rules include occupancy and size limits (staff referenced a 960 square‑foot limit for a second dwelling in the example discussed) and said frontage minimums and other development standards could limit a subdivision. Staff also offered to meet with the resident to review parcel frontage requirements and next steps for rezoning or a general plan amendment.

No formal action or vote was taken on either public comment item; staff offered follow‑up assistance to the parcel owner.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Commission 5/8/2025","oneSentenceSummary","During public comment at the May 8 meeting, a resident urged a speed limit for a local bike trail and another resident asked about splitting an R‑1 parcel and options including rezoning or an accessory dwelling unit; planning staff explained rezoning and the ADU option and identified frontage and lot‑size limits to consider.","taxTitle","Hooper City Council, Hooper , Weber County, Utah","taxId",21280,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6567933,"Hooper planning commission gives final approval to Flint Subdivision and Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2",82,483000,565000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3241544-363e2b915a2840f661b58fa8cb36145e&start=483&end=565","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3241544-363e2b915a2840f661b58fa8cb36145e/thumbnail_483000.jpg","/articles/6567933/Utah/Hooper-planning-commission-gives-final-approval-to-Flint-Subdivision-and-Rosslyn-Ranch-Phase-2","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6567933-331c85113222f4832383bcc238b566cf/orig.mp4?Expires=1770516808&Signature=CohhuRPMggnhukEjbPv93C9-URHXRGnnDrxOtcUi6FnHzh5d6LyIZ~G0NPloOnSc1-NPBAIIzOSaFwpgAZONVkoowCpQXKvk7kqL8CZvVHQusAmyUINu-rSaWnS9vd0N77HcacuNYEvVSIv-dwsR9PFKWps01ASU4e0pLs97WLKEBNhxEJyDBu3Ym6AwFohlODWHCwK1qz7~1rREkTu9g31z9hZ-gzvbtH6JxWVXqafQTPgBUsWJlSomS-d97yiNOdWnZF~RBXeo5~FaQIIBRFuPGy-xxAJRckGa5YOAyC3WTi8jHHRI7Go2SuEyBF1OPRilqcD7Sbx-FCrOyWl-qQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooper Planning Commission approved final plats for the Flint Subdivision and Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2 at its May 8 meeting, following staff review and recommendations.

Planning staff told the commission the Flint Subdivision — described in staff materials as a one‑acre, one‑lot parcel with frontage that meets city requirements and located near 6700 West — has all required utility final letters and engineering plans on file. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommended final approval after four review cycles and recommended that certain frontage improvements be deferred through the ordinance‑prescribed escrow process. Staff also said the applicant supplied a signed waiver regarding a land‑use separation fence from the adjacent property owner.

The Flint Subdivision final approval was moved by Commissioner Prince and seconded by Michelle Wiesen; the motion passed.

For Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2, staff said the proposal had previously received preliminary approval and that the developer elected to use the current final approval process. Staff materials indicated the phase includes roughly 28 lots and that the project sits between two existing land‑use designations noted in the packet. Through multiple review cycles the applicant addressed drainage concerns (including added rear drainage) and provided final approval letters from utility providers; the TRC recommended approval.

A representative for the Rosslyn Ranch applicant noted the project history of prior public hearings and rezones going back to 2017 and 2020, which staff confirmed in discussion. Commissioners also noted that an outstanding neighbor concern brought up during the commission's work session had been resolved to staff's satisfaction.

Commissioner Sudbury moved approval of Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2 (Parcel 15‑527‑007); Commissioner Greenock seconded the motion. The motion passed.

The commission did not direct any additional studies or conditions beyond those documented in the staff memos and the TRC recommendations. Staff indicated required improvement plans are on file and that any deferred frontage work will be secured through the city’s escrow process as described in the staff memorandum.

Minor procedural business at the start of the meeting included approving minutes from the April 10, 2025 meeting with a correction noted for a December 12 vote record; that motion was approved before the subdivision items.

Votes at a glance:
- Motion: Approve minutes dated 04/10/2025 (with correction to December 12 vote record). Outcome: approved.
- Motion: Final approval of Flint Subdivision (site near 6700 West; one one‑acre lot). Mover: Commissioner Prince. Second: Michelle Wiesen. Outcome: approved.
- Motion: Final approval of Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2 (Parcel 15‑527‑007; ~28 lots). Mover: Commissioner Sudbury. Second: Commissioner Greenock. Outcome: approved.

Staff noted that final approval letters from utility providers were on file for both projects and that the plats meet applicable city development ordinances and zoning requirements as presented to the commission.","The Hooper Planning Commission on May 8 granted final approvals for the Flint Subdivision (one lot) and Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2 (about 28 lots) after staff and the Technical Review Committee said each met zoning and city development requirements; utility final letters and required improvements were reported as complete.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Residents raise bike‑trail speed limit and parcel‑split questions during Hooper planning commission public comment

Hooper planning commission gives final approval to Flint Subdivision and Rosslyn Ranch Phase 2