In the heart of Caldwell's city hall, council members gathered to address pressing matters concerning local property and county relations. The atmosphere was charged with a sense of responsibility as discussions unfolded around the fair market value of a piece of property, a topic that has become increasingly relevant amid ongoing negotiations with Canyon County.

Councilor Daugherty initiated the conversation by questioning the county's obligation to pay fair market prices for property, emphasizing the need for transparency in financial dealings. "It seems like we get a new bill from the county quite often for different services that they provide," he noted, advocating for a reciprocal relationship where the county compensates the city fairly.

Councilor Stowe echoed this sentiment, urging clarity on the property's market value. The dialogue quickly shifted to the implications for local residents, with Councilor Elgud raising concerns about access to driveways for homes adjacent to the property in question. Assurances were made that residents would not be left without access, as the public alley along the railroad would remain open.

However, the conversation took a more cautious turn when Councilor Williams expressed concerns about the city's current lack of a formal mechanism to charge for right-of-way vacations. "As much as we want to be good partners with them, I want it to be a two-way road," he stated, highlighting the need for a balanced approach in negotiations with the county.

The council ultimately decided to table the discussion, allowing more time to gather necessary information and explore potential solutions. "We just know for certain we can get those questions," Councilor Dody remarked, emphasizing the importance of thoroughness before moving forward.

As the meeting progressed, the council's decision to postpone the matter reflected a commitment to ensuring that all voices are heard and that the interests of Caldwell's residents are prioritized. With the item tabled indefinitely, the council will revisit the issue when more clarity is achieved, leaving the door open for future discussions that could shape the city's relationship with the county and its residents' access to essential services.