The Fish Camp Planning Advisory Council convened on May 3, 2025, to discuss various community concerns and the future structure of the council. The meeting highlighted the importance of maintaining a structured communication platform for residents, particularly in light of challenges posed by the Brown Act, which governs public meetings in California.

The discussion began with council members expressing the need for a more formalized structure to ensure that community voices are heard. One member emphasized that disbanding the council could lead to diminished engagement and representation, suggesting that a rebranding of the council might be beneficial. The idea of splitting responsibilities among board members to enhance community outreach was also proposed.

Concerns were raised regarding the scheduling of meetings, which often excluded residents who work during traditional hours. A suggestion was made to allow electronic meetings, which could facilitate greater participation from community members who cannot attend in person. This proposal aimed to adapt to the needs of residents, particularly those who live outside the immediate area but own property in Fish Camp.

The council also discussed the importance of direct communication with the Board of Supervisors. Members were encouraged to express their concerns, such as road maintenance issues, through letters or public comments, thereby asserting their representation of the community. This approach was seen as a way to bypass bureaucratic hurdles and ensure that local issues are addressed more effectively.

Public comments during the meeting underscored frustrations with the current system, particularly regarding the perceived limitations imposed by the Brown Act. One resident from Reno articulated the challenges faced by property owners who cannot vote but still wish to voice their concerns. The sentiment was echoed by others who felt that the existing framework restricted their ability to communicate effectively with local representatives.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to explore options for improving community engagement and ensuring that all voices are heard. The council plans to continue discussions on how to adapt its structure and meeting formats to better serve the needs of Fish Camp residents. Future meetings will likely focus on refining these proposals and addressing the ongoing concerns raised by community members.