[{"_1":2,"_86":-5,"_87":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6565172,"mediaKeyId","3225081-82d239b3cb95bac5fc28e0d20cb48ae4","parentId",3225081,"title","Council upholds planning commission approval for Fit7 indoor/outdoor soccer facility with added limits after neighbors’ appeal","audioSeconds",4376,"startMs",5913000,"endMs",10289000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3225081-82d239b3cb95bac5fc28e0d20cb48ae4&start=5913&end=10289","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3225081-82d239b3cb95bac5fc28e0d20cb48ae4/thumbnail_5913000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6565172/Baldwin-Park-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-upholds-planning-commission-approval-for-Fit7-indooroutdoor-soccer-facility-with-added-limits-after-neighbors-appeal","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6565172-49fedfc5ae07315f1a71c13a6874a38b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770437901&Signature=FbUtr9KxRmh0Hn2n9u71LQiCKudyDZv6lAE0Yq7MtGMX1wntifbZopu4JjMOa-b5XT6JyntIlcDYDMWQOSLTXFlM7nv8BwWfJhJlGUfKPxGloH6F2QYUsmDwHtRN03GBzMjLYVuzzXChfUph75LuHn0Dv43WxMtlMADjskHjMn5euseahTe-gjc4ma2pcoQVY-02REOTA5RVUjeJJCAGWRsyr0LmLYJ71FnPu-21zWMNndkk7comVaScrfUfMbWXFScvEGspQENa7L9oqCBhcfKN4piXNjLKCc8X5xGk3BbEMXYRhrxfy5BP1QVlamWM0QrYZBxHPG9F~rjh-eBfSw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-05-08T06:35:15Z","article","Baldwin Park — The Baldwin Park City Council on May 7 denied an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval and granted land‑use permission for a proposed Fit7 indoor/outdoor soccer training facility at 14412–14424 Joan Bridge Street, but added conditions intended to limit impacts on adjacent homes.

The project proposes to convert an existing industrial building into a specialized training venue with multiple small indoor fields and rooftop fields built over a parking structure; plans submitted to the city show 39 on‑site parking spaces beneath elevated turf areas, fencing with padding around fields, and new landscaping along the property edge. Planning staff reported the proposed use required a conditional use permit and design review and recommended upholding the commission’s approval, concluding the project qualified for the state CEQA infill exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15332) and that submitted studies showed parking, noise and lighting could be conditioned to meet city standards.

Neighbors who live directly behind the property appealed, saying the rooftop fields and associated activity would create excessive noise and light, could send soccer balls into backyards, reduce property values, and did not meet setback and lot‑coverage expectations for a development adjacent to homes. Appellant Susan Cole and others presented scaled diagrams to the council showing how the new rooftop fields would relate to nearby rear yards and said monitoring at a comparable facility showed short‑term maximum noise readings substantially above Baldwin Park standards.

Planning staff and the project applicant argued the facility is a training‑only use (no tournaments or walk‑in events), would primarily serve children and youth, and that detailed conditions — including limits on amplified sound and hours — would prevent disruption. Attorney Travis Van Leighton, representing the applicant Sheema Berenji, said Fit7 is intended to be a community training resource and that the applicant would work with the city on mitigation.

Council action and conditions: After public testimony from neighbors, parents and athletes and questions from councilmembers about parking turnover, ball containment and operations, Mayor Alejandra Avila moved to uphold the Planning Commission approval with additional conditions requested during the hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Damien seconded. On roll call the measure passed by three votes in favor (Estrada, Damien, Avila) with Councilmembers Ayala and Lozano opposing.

The council’s motion added several specific conditions beyond the commission’s original package; among the conditions recorded on the record were:
- Overhead netting above rooftop fields to contain balls and prevent missiles into adjacent yards.
- Southern (rear) elevation treatment and landscape buffer: mature trees and shrubs to be installed as part of the landscape plan, sized by city standard as “mature” at installation.
- Limitations on outdoor lighting and hours: staff and applicant must submit a photometric plan showing no directed light onto adjacent properties; exterior field and parking lights must be off by 10:30 p.m. and training activities were limited to end at 9:30 p.m. on weekdays (the council also discussed more conservative hours for weekend use as a possible condition).
- Pre‑occupancy verification: the applicant must submit a post‑installation noise study showing compliance with Baldwin Park noise standards and an updated photometric survey to confirm no glare or light spillover at the property line before a certificate of occupancy is issued.
- Operational limits: no walk‑in tournaments, no amplified outdoor announcements, whistles or horns; training limited to ages 5–17 as described in the business narrative.
- A condition encouraging discounted rates for Baldwin Park residents if the applicant offers resident verification and a written program for subsidized slots (council asked staff to work with the applicant on implementation details).

Staff also added an indemnification requirement in the conditions package to protect the city. The council instructed staff to finalize the precise language of the added conditions and to return to planning if technical amendments are needed.

What the council did not change: The council upheld the Planning Commission’s finding that the project qualified for the CEQA Class 32 infill exemption; it did not require a full environmental impact report at this time, but the added pre‑occupancy verification steps were intended to ensure code compliance in practice.

Ending: Neighbors said they remained concerned about nighttime activity and long‑term effects on property values; parents and athletes who spoke urged the council to support youth development and praised the applicant’s community track record. Council members voting in favor emphasized the city’s interest in additional recreational opportunities and asked staff to ensure strict enforcement of the new conditions once finalized.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025-05-07 Regular Council Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Baldwin Park — The City Council on May 7 upheld the Planning Commission’s approval of a Fit7 indoor/outdoor soccer training facility at 14412–14424 Joan Bridge Street, but attached additional conditions — including overhead netting, mature landscaping, pre‑occupancy noise and photometric verification and limits on hours and amplified sound — after neighbors appealed.","taxTitle","Baldwin Park City, Los Angeles County, California","taxId",4695,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6565175,"Council receives final feasibility study for Ramona Boulevard–Metrolink grade separation, directs staff to pursue partners and funding",2062,3223000,5285000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3225081-82d239b3cb95bac5fc28e0d20cb48ae4&start=3223&end=5285","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3225081-82d239b3cb95bac5fc28e0d20cb48ae4/thumbnail_3223000.jpg","/articles/6565175/Baldwin-Park-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-receives-final-feasibility-study-for-Ramona-BoulevardMetrolink-grade-separation-directs-staff-to-pursue-partners-and-funding","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6565175-01c301ed1a853ccde4d250a1398174fc/orig.mp4?Expires=1770437901&Signature=h1y5mxT0McZ~3oOis7XPX7GjUlaZIynCSstXhvZCYM~RHaf4vYAaqVcRxNDLRyanu16B0nWwoaf-qJfelbR86DzCTpKdNV3vLMlCbD0aOiDFS0uNGvVtFGM0rMohGwgbvLdTEwBwiMc8pxsZ8uZyaE0wQ8IEwLc7QZQJFHh9tVX9R8HKgcRIVNeV3BrjSSsk4f9dS6WIN-EjO2a53UnmXdZLmufNqACpAVa-pzVL07SMh9peyqjd-qADb3iOKUmCqLPutczPgI6UkN9G-d2NE3m6d4h~wLyPhwWZQ5Hb-fRdo4vwOF0dbzQznLBdtloCl5SMYj2Vqvg5qGi19aTwww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Baldwin Park — The Baldwin Park City Council on May 7 received and filed a technical feasibility report from LA Metro on a proposed grade separation where Ramona Boulevard crosses the Metrolink San Bernardino Line, and directed city staff to pursue partnership, design and funding steps needed to advance the project.

The Project Study Report‑equivalent, prepared by LA Metro with consulting support, evaluated four broad alternatives — rail over roadway, rail under roadway, roadway over rail, and roadway under rail — and recommended the preferred solution as lowering Ramona Boulevard under the active rail corridor (the “roadway under track” option). Charles Zhang, senior director for LA Metro Regional Rail Divisions, said the alternative chosen minimized right‑of‑way acquisition and community impacts and did not require interruption of Metrolink operations for an extended period.

Why it matters: Ramona Boulevard is a major east‑west arterial in Baldwin Park; the San Bernardino Metrolink line is one of the system’s busiest corridors. Study authors said the separation would improve safety, eliminate vehicle delays caused by train crossings and reduce collision risk for vehicles and pedestrians.

LA Metro project team members told the council the conceptual project footprint would be about 2,000 linear feet and would require careful staging — including a temporary “shoofly” track during construction — to keep rail service running. The team estimated a conceptual cost in the range of about $113 million in 2025 dollars at the PSRE stage (the consultant included a 30% contingency in the conceptual estimate). The study also modeled an escalation scenario that could push the cost toward roughly $167 million if construction were delayed several years because of inflation and rising construction costs.

City Manager and project presenters noted the study is step one of a multi‑stage process. Charles Zhang described this document as the foundation for future grant submittals: “This is the step 1 — the project study report equivalent — so the city has conceptual design, engineering assumptions and cost estimates to pursue preliminary engineering, environmental clearance and grant funding,” he said.

Council discussion and outcome: Councilmembers asked about impacts to nearby residences and businesses, utility relocations, right‑of‑way needs, and options for acquiring property (the city attorney confirmed the city could use negotiated acquisitions and, if necessary, eminent domain within state law). Councilmember Emmanuel J. Estrada moved to accept the report and to direct staff to pursue project development partnerships with LA Metro, Metrolink, Caltrans, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and others, plus pursue county, state and federal funding and support from elected officials. Councilmember Manuel Lozano seconded the motion.

The motion passed unanimously on roll call (Ayala: yes; Estrada: yes; Lozano: yes; Mayor Pro Tem Damien: yes; Mayor Alejandra Avila: yes). The council’s formal action was to receive and file the PSRE and authorize staff to seek the next steps: environmental clearance, preliminary engineering and grant applications.

What happens next: Presenters recommended beginning the environmental clearance process and preliminary engineering to refine design, reduce contingencies and support grant applications. LA Metro provided a high‑level schedule showing roughly 12 months for design/environmental and an overall start‑to‑finish timeframe of about eight years to construction completion if funding and design move steadily.

Costs and risks: Study authors cautioned the conceptual estimate includes a conservative contingency and that final costs will change as design advances. The council heard that every year of delay will raise the nominal project cost due to inflation and construction‑market pressures. Staff characterized the implementation risk as medium: technically feasible but dependent on multijurisdictional coordination and large capital grants.

Ending: Council members said they supported advancing a feasibility study into the formal project development pipeline and stressed the need to minimize displacement, protect access to nearby businesses and maintain Metrolink service during construction. Staff was directed to report back on funding opportunities and partnership agreements.

","LA Metro presented a technical feasibility study recommending lowering Ramona Boulevard under the San Bernardino Line; council received the report, acknowledged a conceptual cost estimate and an 8‑year schedule, and voted 5‑0 to pursue environmental clearance, design and funding partnerships.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council upholds planning commission approval for Fit7 indoor/outdoor soccer facility with added limits after neighbors’ appeal

Council receives final feasibility study for Ramona Boulevard–Metrolink grade separation, directs staff to pursue partners and funding