Senator Liz Krueger criticizes budget bills' messages of necessity in New York legislature

In a recent New York State Senate session held on May 6, 2025, discussions centered around the contentious use of "messages of necessity" in budget bills, highlighting ongoing debates about legislative processes and constitutional rights. Senator Liz Krueger, a long-time advocate for transparency in government, expressed her concerns regarding the frequent invocation of these messages, which allow for expedited passage of legislation without the usual waiting period. She emphasized that such practices should not be employed unless there is a genuine emergency, a sentiment that resonated with several colleagues across party lines.

Krueger recounted her own experiences from 23 years ago when she challenged the use of these messages in court, arguing that they undermine the constitutional rights of New Yorkers. Despite her past legal efforts, she acknowledged the political nature of the issue, suggesting that a constitutional amendment might be necessary to address the concerns surrounding this legislative tool.

Senator Gennardis responded to Krueger's remarks by pointing out the hypocrisy he perceived among his colleagues who previously supported messages of necessity when they were in the majority. He argued that the current opposition to these messages stems from a shift in power dynamics rather than genuine concern for democratic processes. Gennardis defended the majority's right to utilize messages of necessity, framing it as a legitimate exercise of power granted by the electorate.

The session also included procedural discussions, with various senators voicing their opinions on the appropriateness of certain resolutions and points of order. The debate underscored the complexities of legislative procedures and the differing perspectives on how best to govern effectively while maintaining accountability.

Overall, the session highlighted the ongoing struggle within the New York State Senate regarding legislative transparency and the balance of power. As discussions continue, the implications of these debates will likely influence future legislative practices and the relationship between the majority and minority parties in the Senate. The call for reform, particularly regarding the use of messages of necessity, remains a significant issue that could shape the legislative landscape in New York.