UC Regents face public outcry over funding and policy during comment session

The University of California's Investments Committee meeting on March 17, 2025, was marked by passionate public comments addressing critical issues affecting students and staff across the UC system. A significant focus was on the university's investment practices, particularly regarding companies involved in military manufacturing, which many speakers linked to ongoing violence and human rights violations globally.

The meeting began with a call for transparency and accountability from the UC Regents, as over 30 individuals signed up to voice their concerns. Speakers included students, faculty, and community members who urged the committee to divest from companies profiting from warfare and to prioritize funding for essential services, particularly for marginalized groups such as undocumented and disabled students.

One of the most pressing demands came from students advocating for a $10 million proposal aimed at providing paid learning opportunities for undocumented students. They emphasized the need for equitable access to resources and support, especially in light of rising threats to their rights and safety. The urgency of this request was underscored by the broader context of political tensions affecting vulnerable communities.

Additionally, speakers highlighted the critical staffing shortages and funding inadequacies within disability services at UC campuses. Concerns were raised about the high caseloads faced by disability specialists, which hinder their ability to provide adequate support to students. Advocates called for increased funding and better staffing to ensure that all students receive the accommodations they need to succeed.

The meeting also featured strong sentiments against the university's handling of protests and student activism. Many speakers expressed disappointment with the administration's response to student organizers, accusing it of fostering an environment of repression rather than support. This sentiment was echoed by alumni who felt that the university's actions contradicted its legacy of student activism and social justice.

As the meeting concluded, the call for action was clear: stakeholders demanded that the UC Regents engage directly with the community to address these pressing issues. The discussions underscored a growing movement within the UC system advocating for ethical investment practices and equitable support for all students, signaling a pivotal moment for the university's future direction.