Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

DCYF faces criticism for child placements amid homelessness crisis in Manchester

October 17, 2024 | Special Committee on the Family Division of the Circuit Court, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

DCYF faces criticism for child placements amid homelessness crisis in Manchester
Concerns over the New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) were front and center during a recent House Special Committee meeting, as lawmakers scrutinized the agency's handling of child welfare cases. A key testimony highlighted alarming instances where children remained in potentially harmful environments, specifically citing a case where children were kept in a home for two years despite serious legal violations.

The testimony revealed that DCYF had failed to adhere to court-ordered no contact directives, allowing children to stay with a parent who had multiple criminal charges related to child endangerment. This situation only changed when the family faced homelessness, raising questions about the agency's priorities and decision-making processes. "It's horrific that we're going to go ahead and leave the children in the home... but now that they're facing homelessness, that's when we go ahead and remove the children," one committee member expressed, reflecting widespread frustration.

The discussion also touched on the challenges faced by the Office of the Child Advocate and the ombudsman, which are reportedly being obstructed by local office administrations. This lack of transparency and communication within DCYF has left many advocates and lawmakers concerned about the welfare of vulnerable children in the state.

As the committee continues to investigate these issues, the implications for child welfare policy in New Hampshire remain significant. The recent reinstatement of the rebuttal presumption of harm in child welfare cases may influence future decisions, but the effectiveness of DCYF's response to these ongoing challenges is yet to be seen. The committee's findings could lead to crucial reforms aimed at ensuring the safety and well-being of children across the state.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI