South Carolina panel debates energy efficiency standards for new housing construction

In a recent meeting of the Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee, South Carolina lawmakers engaged in a critical discussion about energy efficiency standards for new home constructions. The atmosphere was charged with the urgency of addressing the state’s energy efficiency ranking, which currently places South Carolina at a concerning 48th in the nation.

As committee members delved into the implications of adopting the 2021 net zero energy code, they faced a stark reality: implementing these standards could add approximately $68,000 to the price of a median-priced home, estimated at $280,000. This significant increase raised concerns about housing affordability, particularly for families already struggling with rising costs.

One committee member highlighted that while newly constructed homes are generally more energy efficient than those built decades ago, they still fall short when compared to the latest energy codes. The discussion underscored the challenges posed by older manufactured housing stock, which contributes heavily to the state’s low energy efficiency ranking.

Despite recognizing the merits of updating energy codes, some members expressed hesitation about making immediate changes. They suggested that further discussion and research were necessary to fully understand the potential impacts on housing costs and market dynamics. A motion was made to remove an amendment related to these energy standards, allowing for continued debate on the issue.

As the meeting progressed, the committee also addressed two amendments aimed at refining the underlying bill, which included nomenclature changes and adjustments to align with Santee Cooper's infrastructure. These amendments were adopted without opposition, paving the way for the bill to move forward.

The committee ultimately voted in favor of the amended bill, but the conversation about energy efficiency and housing costs is far from over. Lawmakers acknowledged the need for a deeper examination of why the market has not produced better outcomes in energy efficiency, hinting at future discussions that could shape South Carolina’s energy landscape. As the state grapples with these pressing issues, the path forward remains uncertain, but the commitment to finding solutions is clear.