The House Committee on Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources, and Water convened on April 30, 2025, to discuss pressing issues affecting Oregon's ranchers, particularly the impact of wolf predation on livestock. The meeting highlighted the significant economic losses ranchers face due to wolf attacks, which have become a critical concern for the agricultural community.
One rancher presented a detailed account of the financial repercussions of wolf predation, noting that wolves, as pack hunters, pose a severe threat to livestock. He explained that constant attacks lead to livestock stress, resulting in weight loss and reduced market value. For instance, a rancher with 100 cows may see each animal come in 50 pounds lighter than expected, translating to a loss of approximately $15,000 at market rates. Additionally, the rancher reported that calves also suffer similar weight losses, contributing another $15,000 in potential revenue loss.
The rancher further elaborated on the indirect costs associated with wolf predation, including stress-related issues that lead to culling and abortions among the herd. He cited a study indicating that while many calves are killed by wolves, only a fraction of these losses are confirmed, complicating compensation claims.
In response to these challenges, the committee discussed a proposed bill aimed at providing compensation for ranchers facing significant losses due to wolf attacks. The bill suggests a compensation framework where ranchers could receive about $20,000 when actual losses exceed $40,000. However, the rancher emphasized that the verification process for these losses would involve third-party assessments by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife or Wildlife Services.
The rancher also raised concerns about the bill's stipulation requiring ranchers to implement non-lethal methods of predator control before seeking compensation. He argued that if Oregonians wish to maintain wolf populations, the financial burden of these losses should be shared more broadly, rather than falling solely on ranchers.
The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between wildlife conservation efforts and the economic realities faced by those in the agricultural sector. As discussions continue, the committee will need to balance the interests of wildlife preservation with the livelihoods of ranchers in Oregon.