Senate panel reviews insurer bad faith defense criteria amid liability disputes

April 30, 2025 | Insurance, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, Louisiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate panel reviews insurer bad faith defense criteria amid liability disputes
In a recent meeting of the Louisiana Legislature, lawmakers engaged in a detailed discussion regarding proposed changes to insurance liability laws, particularly focusing on the concept of bad faith in insurance claims. The meeting highlighted the complexities surrounding how insurers defend against claims and the implications of these defenses on policyholders.

One of the central topics was the legitimacy of liability defenses presented by insurers in court. Legislators examined scenarios where insurers might argue that they had a valid medical causation defense, particularly in cases where medical treatment was delayed or linked to subsequent accidents. The discussion underscored the importance of determining whether an insurer's defense was made in good faith or if it was merely a tactic to avoid paying claims. This distinction is crucial, as a finding of bad faith could lead to significant consequences for insurers, including excess judgments that exceed policy limits.

Senator DuPlessis raised concerns about the previous year's legislation, which focused primarily on property damage claims, questioning why bodily injury claims were not addressed at that time. The response indicated that the intent was to avoid complicating negotiations that were progressing well in property damage discussions. However, the current bill aims to clarify standards related to bad faith claims, which have previously been shaped more by judicial interpretation than by statutory language.

The legislators acknowledged that the existing legal framework allows for a cause of action against insurers for bad faith, but emphasized the need to tighten the criteria under which such claims can be made. The proposed changes would require insurers to at least make an offer to settle within policy limits, a measure intended to protect both insurers and policyholders from excessive judgments.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the discussions around insurance liability and bad faith claims are not only significant for the insurance industry but also for Louisiana residents who rely on these policies for protection. The anticipated next steps include further deliberations on the proposed bill, which aims to balance the interests of insurers and policyholders while addressing the rising costs of insurance in the state.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Louisiana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI