The Alabama House Agriculture and Forestry Committee convened on April 29, 2025, to discuss a proposed bill aimed at addressing the declining number of licensed wildlife rehabilitators in the state. The meeting highlighted the challenges faced by wildlife rehabilitation efforts and the implications of the new legislation.
The bill, presented by a committee member, seeks to allow individuals to provide care for injured wildlife without a permit, provided the species is not federally protected. The speaker noted a significant drop in licensed rehabilitators in Alabama, from over a hundred 15 years ago to just seven currently. This decline has made it increasingly difficult for injured animals to receive timely care, often requiring transport over long distances to find help.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free A key concern raised during the discussion was the impact of a 2013 directive that mandated the euthanization of certain rabies-active species, which has contributed to the reduction in rehabilitators. The proposed legislation aims to empower individuals to care for injured animals on their property, with specific reporting requirements to the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. The care period for any wild bird or animal would be limited to six months, after which the animal must be released back into its original habitat.
However, the bill faced criticism from experienced wildlife rehabilitators, including Stephanie, who has over 20 years of experience in the field. She expressed concerns that the legislation could lead to untrained individuals inadvertently harming the animals they intend to help. Stephanie emphasized the need for specialized knowledge and veterinary care in wildlife rehabilitation, noting that a significant percentage of animals entering rehabilitation require medical attention.
The discussion also touched on the ethical implications of wildlife care, with some committee members advocating for the moral responsibility to assist injured animals. They referenced biblical principles that encourage compassion towards animals, arguing that the bill aligns with these values.
As the meeting concluded, the committee acknowledged the complexities surrounding wildlife rehabilitation and the need for a balanced approach that ensures both animal welfare and public safety. Further deliberations on the bill are expected as stakeholders continue to weigh the potential benefits and risks associated with the proposed changes to wildlife care regulations in Alabama.