On April 29, 2025, the Massachusetts Senate introduced Senate Bill 928, a significant piece of legislation aimed at reshaping the admissions process for public higher education institutions in the Commonwealth. The bill seeks to eliminate the consideration of familial relationships in college admissions, a move that proponents argue will promote fairness and diversity in the applicant pool.
The key provision of Senate Bill 928 amends Chapter 69 of the General Laws by adding a new section that prohibits degree-granting institutions from considering an applicant's familial ties to alumni during the admissions process. Specifically, institutions will not be allowed to include any information regarding a relative's attendance at the institution in their admissions documents. This change is set to take effect for the 2026-2027 academic year, marking a significant shift in how colleges evaluate prospective students.
Supporters of the bill argue that it addresses longstanding concerns about nepotism and privilege in higher education, ensuring that all applicants are evaluated solely on their merits. Advocates believe this will lead to a more equitable admissions process, allowing a broader range of students to access higher education opportunities. By removing familial connections from the equation, the bill aims to foster a more diverse student body that reflects the community's demographics.
However, the bill has sparked debates among lawmakers and education advocates. Critics express concerns that the legislation may overlook the value of legacy admissions, which some argue can enhance community ties and support alumni engagement. Additionally, there are worries about how this change might impact institutions that rely on alumni donations, as legacy connections can often play a role in fundraising efforts.
The implications of Senate Bill 928 extend beyond admissions practices; they touch on broader social and economic issues. By promoting a more inclusive admissions process, the bill could help level the playing field for underrepresented groups, potentially leading to increased enrollment from diverse backgrounds. This shift could have long-term benefits for the workforce and the economy, as a more educated population can contribute to innovation and growth.
As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to weigh the potential benefits of increased fairness in admissions against the concerns raised by opponents. The outcome of this legislation could set a precedent for how higher education institutions across the country approach admissions, making it a pivotal moment for the Commonwealth and its commitment to equitable education.