[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6571789,"mediaKeyId","3148952-44e8f3b9506b2032ca8927e2972fbf04","parentId",3148952,"title","Council clerk reports multiple continuances and committee recommendations; council votes to hold closed session on appointee performance","audioSeconds",43,"startMs",467224,"endMs",510270,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3148952-44e8f3b9506b2032ca8927e2972fbf04&start=467&end=510","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3148952-44e8f3b9506b2032ca8927e2972fbf04/thumbnail_467224.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6571789/Richmond-City-Independent-City/Virginia/Council-clerk-reports-multiple-continuances-and-committee-recommendations-council-votes-to-hold-closed-session-on-appointee-performance","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6571789-a8bfd1c3122dbdd20abb6025ec387d59/orig.mp4?Expires=1770954925&Signature=NhngSzv0nBkpUP1htW2-FbOjtMtwZq45AvzcQzPRFksxnsVCMVPcGRYKUtCzI2zxhtE3ostOrjZEV3HYatvl~aGsjXOd-ztkJaGIZ07bxS~6F2svctoGeI4ylyhBnDRwu~4nIv-0I3M80or23zcfckXZZjVuytDx5FYqgr2AbMXjJ~TndOUJGrYwEfooDvFFNvPpRsP62JlwC18RfmxuUhkPE~5F8YjS~PByEG5Sr5bPV~8t3p~FHQlVoUpuJ-ttHYOb6ZLaETIzdemsS~nRqtkog1jVUDlX76jrPVjCJ2y6WKd9JMBSTIpMpALDjiAp66poqmP4cK2cikU4yJHhMQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Richmond City","date","2025-04-29T00:00:00Z","article","The Richmond City Clerk summarized docket changes and standing-committee recommendations for the council, noting several items scheduled for continuance and a pair of ordinances that planning staff recommended rejecting after public hearings.

The clerk said item 6 (ordinance 20 25 0 53) will be continued to the May 12 council meeting. Items 8 through 12 (ordinance numbers referenced as 20 25 0 506, 0 604, 0 605, 0 606 and 67 in the clerk's report) were forwarded with a Finance and Economic Development Standing Committee recommendation for approval. Item 13 (ordinance 20 25 0 69) was recommended for approval by the Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Standing Committee. Items 14 through 16 (ordinances 20 25 0 70, 0 701 and 72) carried recommendations from the Governmental Operations Standing Committee.

The clerk reported that Item 17 (resolution 20 24 or 41) was to be continued to the May 27 council meeting; Item 18 (Resolution 20 25 R-15) and Item 19 (Resolution 20 25 R-16) were recommended for approval by standing committees. Item 21 (paper 20 24 187) was scheduled to be amended and continued later and then to the May 12 meeting; a different Item 21 listed as 20 24 329 was scheduled to be continued to June 9. The clerk said Planning Commission recommended denial of items 22 (ordinance referenced as 20 20 five-fifty 8) and 23 (ordinance 20 25 0 55) and that after an opportunity for public hearing the recommendation was that the council reject those ordinances. Item 24 (ordinance 20 25 0 68) was forwarded from committee with no recommendation and remained on the regular agenda.

The clerk also noted that items 25 through 31 were budget-related papers; items 25 and 26 would be amended later in the evening and then continued to the May 12 council meeting, while items 27 through 31 would be continued to May 12.

After the docket summary, a motion was made to move into a closed meeting under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. A council member moved that the City Council go into a closed meeting \"pursuant to subdivision a 1 of section 2.2-3711 of [the Virginia Freedom of Information Act] to discuss the performance of a council appointee,\" and Miss Jones seconded the motion. The council then conducted a roll-call vote. Recorded responses in the excerpt were: Mister Breton — aye; Miss Gibson — yes; Miss Jones — aye; Miss Robertson — aye; Miss Lynch — absent; Miss Trammell — aye; Miss Auerbach — aye; Vice President Jeroden — aye; President Newbill — aye. The clerk announced that the motion had been approved and the closed session would be held in the Second Floor Large Conference Room.

The council took no recorded votes on the substantive ordinances identified in the docket summary during the excerpted portion of the meeting; the clerk's report conveyed committee recommendations and scheduling actions but did not itself constitute final disposition.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Richmond City - Richmond City Council Informal Meeting - April 28, 2025 - Apr 29, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The city clerk summarized docket changes and committee recommendations, including multiple continuances and Planning Commission denials; the council then voted unanimously to enter a closed session under the Virginia FOIA to discuss the performance of a council appointee.","taxTitle","Richmond City (Independent City), Virginia","taxId",5755,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6571792,"Richmond officials: rebate check mailings delayed after printing error; audit underway",76,365030,441905,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3148952-44e8f3b9506b2032ca8927e2972fbf04&start=365&end=441","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3148952-44e8f3b9506b2032ca8927e2972fbf04/thumbnail_365030.jpg","/articles/6571792/Richmond-City-Independent-City/Virginia/Richmond-officials-rebate-check-mailings-delayed-after-printing-error-audit-underway","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6571792-63ff5a6b56a7c5dfa54bf43fcfe21dd6/orig.mp4?Expires=1770954925&Signature=fi2nlDaZSjnEPd3Jh9Et4sQDEBIyUOslRKqX5GiYUnff1RLGK5kZca1NxJvMqiyNixEIqFLyjl7Zi0PyeIDkYOOjgaNOY88vARfVS9sI0qT6mjxcAAD2IPKYe3AqFp662mGbgWKzX9B~vqDHxX-7sRNRhQm6vlEYAsalioNXrJ-1d4zMW1cB5GLog-AwQ3QYJjRYA5ONpLq9HozyMU3E0VCwWgDAqgLEHThJkTucdiu1~1lpPUwzuCWnv9mlbyd2pRjQze-qCB2cRI6keg1XBVtbh5~yCn5To5uE2H3owBuu2hfFIvQTvV4BJKfA0tTiyjECK5E4BOaELL-8o8KL4g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Richmond City officials told the City Council that a printing error produced misprinted property rebate checks, prompting a stop-payment, an internal audit and delays to mailing and distribution.

Sabrina Joy Hogg, interim chief administrative officer, said during the council meeting that “there was a discrepancy in the mailing that happened with the pay to the order of… several thousand checks were printed in the wrong form.” She said the director ordered a stop to the mailing and an audit of the process to ensure accuracy before further distribution.

The discrepancy led the city to place stop payments on the printed checks. Hogg said that pause meant some valid checks were “caught in the middle” and that staff expect to finish the audit analysis before resuming distribution. She said the finance office will reimburse bank fees for any valid checks that incurred stop-payment charges.

The city provided two aggregate figures during the discussion: the mailings relate to roughly 79,000 properties, and about 40,000 checks were held back during the stop-payment action. Hogg told council members the audit is “almost done with the whole audit analysis,” and that staff are awaiting actual numbers to finalize next steps.

Councilors who raised the issue were told to refer constituents with questions about a stop-payment or deposit problem to the finance office for assistance and reimbursement of bank fees. The council did not take any formal vote on the issue during the meeting; the remarks were an administrative update.

Sheila White, identified in the meeting as “the director,” was described by Hogg as the staff member who ordered the stop and the audit; White did not speak in the recorded excerpt.

City staff did not provide a timetable for when corrected checks will be mailed or exactly how many do-overs will be issued; Hogg said staff are “waiting for actual numbers to come back” from the audit. The council did not set a follow-up vote or directive in the recorded discussion.

The discussion occurred during the regular meeting and was presented as an informational update from city administration; no ordinance or budget action was recorded alongside the remarks.","City staff told Richmond City Council that a printing error produced misprinted rebate checks, triggering a stop-payment and an audit; officials said about 40,000 checks were held while the city reviews the mailing and will reimburse bank fees for stopped valid checks.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council clerk reports multiple continuances and committee recommendations; council votes to hold closed session on appointee performance

Richmond officials: rebate check mailings delayed after printing error; audit underway