The Town of Yarmouth held a meeting on December 9, 2024, to discuss the ongoing issues surrounding window replacements for a local housing project. The primary focus was on the challenges faced in selecting appropriate windows that meet energy efficiency standards required for funding.

During the meeting, it was revealed that the wooden windows initially requested for the front of the property could not be included in the funding application due to their failure to meet the necessary energy efficiency values. The installer confirmed that there is no manufacturer that provides wooden windows compliant with the required R and U values. Consequently, if the wooden windows remain, the homeowner would be responsible for their replacement at full cost.

The discussion then shifted to the vinyl windows, specifically the five front windows classified as twentieth-century models. The expert indicated that while some of the older, original nineteenth-century windows could be replaced with vinyl, the specifications for these replacements included features such as 6 over 6 grids and simulated divided light. However, it was noted that windows eligible for funding would not include these upgrades, which would result in additional costs for the homeowner.

The homeowner expressed disappointment regarding the financial implications of upgrading the windows. The cost for adding grids and simulated divided light would total approximately $8,820 for 21 windows, which would be an out-of-pocket expense. The meeting highlighted the frustration over the inability to restore the wooden windows, which the homeowner felt were in greater need of assistance.

Additionally, the possibility of using interior storm windows was discussed, but it was clarified that these could not be funded either, as they do not meet the energy efficiency standards required by the housing assistance program.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities and financial burdens associated with window replacements in the Town of Yarmouth, particularly regarding compliance with energy efficiency standards and the limitations of available funding options. The discussions will likely prompt further exploration of alternative solutions for homeowners facing similar challenges.