Legislation targets child-like sex dolls with severe penalties for possession and dissemination

April 25, 2025 | Senate Bills, Introduced Bills, 2025 Bills, Minnesota Legislation Bills, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Legislation targets child-like sex dolls with severe penalties for possession and dissemination
On April 25, 2025, the Minnesota State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 1417, a significant piece of legislation aimed at addressing the growing concerns surrounding child exploitation and the distribution of child-like sex dolls. This bill seeks to establish strict penalties for the possession and dissemination of these dolls, which are defined as anatomically correct representations of minors intended for sexual use.

One of the key provisions of Senate Bill 1417 is the criminalization of the dissemination of child-like sex dolls. Under the proposed law, individuals who knowingly distribute such dolls could face felony charges, with potential sentences of up to seven years in prison and fines reaching $10,000. The penalties increase significantly for repeat offenders or those with prior convictions related to child exploitation, with maximum sentences extending to 15 years and fines of up to $20,000.

Additionally, the bill prohibits the possession of child-like sex dolls, imposing a felony charge for individuals who knowingly possess these items. Offenders could face up to five years in prison and fines of up to $5,000. This provision reflects a growing recognition of the potential harm these dolls may pose in normalizing or perpetuating harmful behaviors towards minors.

The introduction of Senate Bill 1417 has sparked notable debates among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step in protecting children from exploitation and reinforcing societal norms against child sexualization. They emphasize the importance of taking a firm stance against any materials that could contribute to harmful behaviors.

Conversely, opponents of the bill raise concerns about potential overreach and the implications for personal freedoms. Some argue that the legislation could inadvertently criminalize individuals who possess such dolls for non-exploitative purposes, such as artistic expression or educational use. This has led to calls for clearer definitions and guidelines within the bill to prevent unintended consequences.

The economic implications of Senate Bill 1417 are also noteworthy. By imposing strict penalties on the distribution and possession of child-like sex dolls, the legislation could deter the market for such items, potentially impacting manufacturers and retailers involved in their production and sale. Furthermore, the bill aligns with broader societal efforts to combat child exploitation, which may resonate positively with constituents concerned about child safety.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to balance the urgent need for child protection with the rights of individuals, making amendments and adjustments as necessary. The discussions surrounding Senate Bill 1417 highlight a critical moment in Minnesota's legislative landscape, reflecting the state's commitment to addressing child exploitation while navigating the complexities of personal freedoms and societal norms.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI