Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Pennsylvania General Assembly amends Right-to-Know Law to include criminal penalties

April 28, 2025 | Senate Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Pennsylvania Legislation Bills , Pennsylvania


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Pennsylvania General Assembly amends Right-to-Know Law to include criminal penalties
On April 28, 2025, the Pennsylvania Legislature introduced Senate Bill 686, aimed at strengthening the state's Right-to-Know Law by imposing criminal penalties for the unlawful alteration or destruction of public records. This bill, sponsored by Senators Dush, Rothman, Coleman, Phillips-Hill, Stefano, and J. Ward, seeks to enhance transparency and accountability within state and local agencies.

The key provision of Senate Bill 686 introduces a new section to the existing Right-to-Know Law, defining a criminal offense for individuals who intentionally impair the verity or availability of records requested under the law. Such actions would be classified as a felony of the third degree, signaling a serious legal consequence for those found guilty of obstructing public access to information.

The bill was referred to the State Government Committee on the same day it was introduced, indicating a swift legislative process. Proponents argue that this measure is essential for protecting the integrity of public records and ensuring that citizens can access information without fear of manipulation or concealment. They emphasize that the bill addresses growing concerns about transparency in government operations.

However, the bill has sparked debates regarding its potential implications. Critics express concerns about the broad language of the proposed law, fearing it may lead to unintended consequences or overreach in enforcement. Some legal experts suggest that the definition of what constitutes "impairing" a record could be interpreted in various ways, potentially leading to challenges in its application.

The economic and social implications of Senate Bill 686 could be significant. By reinforcing the Right-to-Know Law, the bill aims to foster greater public trust in government institutions, which may encourage civic engagement and participation. Conversely, the introduction of criminal penalties could deter individuals from working in public service roles due to fears of legal repercussions.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Stakeholders from various sectors will likely continue to weigh in on the potential benefits and drawbacks of this proposed amendment to Pennsylvania's transparency laws. The outcome of Senate Bill 686 could set a precedent for how public records are managed and protected in the state, impacting both government accountability and citizen rights.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill