City Council debates increasing ADU yard occupancy limits for floodplain units

April 28, 2025 | Revere City, Suffolk County, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council debates increasing ADU yard occupancy limits for floodplain units
The Zoning Sub-Committee of Revere City convened on April 28, 2025, to discuss amendments related to zoning regulations, particularly focusing on detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in flood-prone areas. The meeting highlighted concerns regarding the current restrictions on the percentage of yard space that can be occupied by these units.

The primary discussion centered on a proposed amendment to increase the allowable occupancy of rear and side yards for detached units from 25% to potentially 35% or even 50%. One committee member expressed that the existing limitation could be prohibitive for residents living in flood plains who may not have sufficient yard space to build, especially since basements are often not an option in these areas.

The committee deliberated on the implications of such a change, weighing the need for flexibility against the potential for oversized structures that could dominate small backyards. A suggestion was made to consider a square footage limit for ADUs instead of a percentage of yard space, to maintain control over the size of the units while accommodating the unique challenges faced by homeowners in flood-prone zones.

Concerns were raised about the impact of increased impermeable surfaces on stormwater management and compliance with existing conservation regulations. The committee acknowledged that any changes must align with current city ordinances, including a requirement for maintaining a certain percentage of green space on properties.

The chair of the committee indicated openness to the proposed changes, but emphasized that any amendments would require a formal vote from the committee. The discussions underscored the balance between providing housing options and adhering to environmental regulations, reflecting the complexities of zoning in areas vulnerable to flooding. The committee plans to continue evaluating these proposals in future meetings, aiming to find a solution that meets the needs of residents while ensuring compliance with broader city policies.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI