The Louisiana Legislature's recent government meeting on April 28, 2025, focused on the contentious Mid Barataria Sediment Diversion Project, drawing passionate opposition from local fishermen and stakeholders. The meeting highlighted concerns about the project's potential negative impact on the fishing industry and coastal ecosystems in Southeast Louisiana.

A licensed boat captain representing small family fishermen voiced strong opposition to the diversion project, emphasizing that it threatens not only their livelihoods but also the future of fishing families in the region. He criticized the Coastal Protection Restoration Authority (CPRA) for what he described as a lack of genuine collaboration and transparency in the planning process. Instead of engaging with the community, he claimed that the CPRA imposed decisions without considering the voices of those most affected.

The captain articulated the importance of responsible coastal restoration, arguing that the project could harm vital marine habitats and disrupt the fisheries that are crucial to both local and national food security. He pointed out that the fisheries of Southeast Louisiana are a national asset, feeding millions and playing a critical role in maintaining food supply chains, especially during times of global strain.

Concerns were also raised about the scientific integrity of the project, with accusations that data had been selectively used to justify federal permits. The captain highlighted that the outfall area of the diversion, rich in marine life, had not been adequately addressed in the project's environmental impact assessments. He called for accountability and responsible management of coastal restoration efforts, urging the committee to prioritize the health of marine environments and the communities that depend on them.

Another speaker, Rocky O'Cheryl, a representative from the shrimp buying bureau, echoed these sentiments, expressing fears that the diversion could devastate local fisheries. He criticized the project's scale and timeline, arguing that any potential benefits would take too long to materialize, risking the livelihoods of current fishermen.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between environmental restoration efforts and the economic realities faced by local fishing communities. As discussions continue, stakeholders are calling for a more inclusive approach that prioritizes both ecological health and the preservation of local livelihoods. The outcome of this project remains uncertain, but the voices of fishermen and their advocates are increasingly demanding to be heard in the decision-making process.