[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6260415,"mediaKeyId","3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde","parentId",3131612,"title","Court reviews estimates for four road-slip repairs; FEMA reimbursement and timeline explained","audioSeconds",378,"startMs",3021000,"endMs",3399000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde&start=3021&end=3399","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde/thumbnail_3021000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6260415/Clark-County/Kentucky/Court-reviews-estimates-for-four-road-slip-repairs-FEMA-reimbursement-and-timeline-explained","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6260415-43cd3367c9aec5ff5c1419171ff0ad31/orig.mp4?Expires=1770416523&Signature=WPtxcd2UJu2RulYM9QmUeHwbv5kzx-paVBP6TPHmxnCSLCs9Yeh3NmaDBQEYupFT0XwP3ZVqC1jXrYeQUAqn6p~sxTGgrKdW9h8NKY7T6qAoKfznvNH3Lcn89f7Poqo6tD9Q8UNP8NFLkPggCeZDVqY7DyeI-uSqV5nrBLOyxmVo7sSCiiIN~kwqqi6fyY2dOmjuK8t119mlgmHaHYjczoRLZIphMwlseZyWToqYqSni5kqXeS2ENG~70GfZigzIVQ71AAY7VAhqBzax6QZjgjSl71zxD6n5IVJcS4LsruANEWUp-T3rn0PREhyjRSpANSvwspQVoD0IcnDbcsp39w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Clark County, KY ","date","2025-04-26T12:55:56.13Z","article","Road supervisors and fiscal court members discussed estimated costs and federal-state reimbursement rules for at least four road-slip locations damaged during recent storms.

County staff reported four distinct slip sites. Preliminary contractor estimates provided during the meeting put rail-and-cribbing repairs at roughly $64,000 for Site 1, about $92,000 for one of the larger slips, and an approximately $129,000 estimate for the worst site that the staff said \"would engulf a car\" if driven over. One site may only require resurfacing rather than structural cribbing.

Officials explained FEMA Public Assistance rules and the expected cost share: roughly 75% federal, 13% county, and 12% state for eligible public assistance. Staff said FEMA distinguishes between a \"slip\" (reimbursable) and a \"slide\" (damage from private property above the roadway that is typically the owner's responsibility). The court also reviewed the project-threshold rules: if an individual project exceeds federal large-project thresholds (in past examples noted around $1.4 million), it changes the reimbursement and documentation process.

Next steps: The court agreed to advertise for bids/estimates and proceed with the repair work; staff cautioned that reimbursement can take many months and that federal monitoring may extend timeline. Officials estimated it can take about 12 months or more to obligate and receive reimbursement depending on federal review timelines.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","April 24, 2025 Regular Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Clark County officials reviewed contractor estimates for four road slips, discussed likely FEMA/public-assistance cost shares, and described next steps for advertising and repairs.","taxTitle","Clark County, Kentucky","taxId",59468,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6260420,"Residents urge court to require traffic study and evening hearing on proposed high-capacity truck stop",179,2384000,2563000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde&start=2384&end=2563","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde/thumbnail_2384000.jpg","/articles/6260420/Clark-County/Kentucky/Residents-urge-court-to-require-traffic-study-and-evening-hearing-on-proposed-high-capacity-truck-stop","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6260420-3a0c54272b0fdb2fdee8f645103c763e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770416523&Signature=FtljQNryBp1HXGp9aXJbJOCvxYnYhxBaa0BGjDRGdxEkN1VM2rxZdLLx2se~kb7fKOssce7dVXM7wruR0MLlDQEzKa755ZtLC4NUY6C1bUzIre7CWEZN2r8D9GNjfDGJqHXX4RJyl5z7b-uVE4-wZBt1dfavY~1Dpz2avp7~RoWWCyIm67jgZrZ6eoOpVzEhQ5GrYJbSPoiC1ry9IhL6F5zWK-yKaF5MCCEYGClA4XAeNPI3kG9q2o0Gvvj0EjQ~9vOjH~ot36XY~Vl5NnCAiqrsQBY7APbiYayQ-BkfYg5bQ1xL7I-GYxG7zhH0~sXR7WzVOnmUgMYsvdrJ3~gxnw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A Clark County resident urged the fiscal court to pause consideration of a proposed high-capacity truck stop and to require additional traffic and safety studies and more accessible public hearings.

Aaron Cooster, speaking for himself and the Parish Road Action Group, told the court that a vote for a truck stop \"is a vote for profit over people and community values\" and argued county decision-makers should rely on \"truth data and not assumptions or misinformation.\" He said the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) has final authority over access permits but that the county can and should require a thorough traffic impact study (TIS) and safety audit as conditions of any local approval.

Cooster asked that any public hearings on the project be scheduled in the evening or on weekends so residents who work daytime hours can attend. He listed community concerns including traffic safety, congestion, road maintenance costs, emergency response strain and noise impacts.

Why it matters: The proposed truck stop — referenced by commenters as a high-capacity facility similar to existing Love's locations — could produce sustained heavy truck traffic on county roads. Cooster recommended the court coordinate with local planning authorities, require a comprehensive TIS prior to action, and consult with neighboring Madison County officials about their experience.

Court response: The public comment was entered into the record; no action or vote occurred on the matter at this meeting. Officials acknowledged the request and noted KYTC’s authority over access permits, while public commenters urged additional county-level scrutiny and outreach.","A resident group urged Clark County Fiscal Court to require a traffic impact study and to schedule public hearings at times accessible to working residents before considering a proposed high-capacity truck stop.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6260425,"Court approves payment of emergency contractor bills after debate over judge's emergency powers",139,1736000,1875000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde&start=1736&end=1875","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde/thumbnail_1736000.jpg","/articles/6260425/Clark-County/Kentucky/Court-approves-payment-of-emergency-contractor-bills-after-debate-over-judges-emergency-powers","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6260425-1ebdc5eb35731e4cae042c0eb9e1558b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770416523&Signature=k8IffrQ3OHW67UWoILFgmYPrrTaYZZ94lcmzrgnmLu8EPIJS1kmxrCXY1XK3ivcESPtj5lE~IFqCY82E9sDSDtq~bAsGvOWVujjiuJlETUl6OemmNvwXtirFmal0jETlqP9yMdTFRxR47wfAmctmOp4Swh9dyVtAuwUF0QzUkNTHHnG-daiomqYQbZUSyADf0DU4vH4a7n9au4mYmwHC-2W1khAZlz6vMIZ1m5RYhSc6kH8iqdv02nDrYs1kO0EjKUX9V4XhsK46JpGKnTNjiC1yiuzmCmotWqmrVURSFs3Vce6yF~g2bX~Wu7AkQ7TxqpnCad94jDbF2ET70DWO1w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Clark County Fiscal Court on an April meeting approved payment of bills tied to temporary staffing arrangements the county used after a series of weather and flooding emergencies, but several magistrates said the process should have included clearer documentation and quicker follow-up to the court.

The invoices at issue stem from short-term hires and a contract through a temporary-staffing vendor after back-to-back emergencies — an initial ice event, a snow event and two flood incidents. Some magistrates said the judge’s emergency declaration granted executive authority to act quickly in those circumstances, while others said the court should have been informed and contracts presented for approval sooner.

Judge defended the emergency use of executive authority, saying the declaration exists to \"cut out the red tape\" when events require immediate action. Several magistrates said they would accept the current bills for payment but insisted that future emergency hires and contracts be presented at the next possible meeting. One magistrate described the situation as potentially unlawful but said he would approve payment this time to avoid disrupting payroll and services.

What happened: After extended discussion, the court voted and approved payment of the contractor bills tied to the temporary staffing. Officials agreed to a practice change: if the executive exercises emergency powers, the court should be notified and the contract brought before the court at the next meeting for review.

Why it matters: The debate touched both fiscal accountability and the practical need for rapid response during disasters. Several members said the county should adopt clearer procedures so emergency contracting does not create legal or budgetary exposure.","Magistrates debated whether the county judge had authority to enter short-term contracts during consecutive emergencies before approving payment of contractor invoices tied to phone-answering and temporary staffing.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6260430,"Fiscal court approves multiple budget and cash transfers amid warnings about overspending",662,412000,1074000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde&start=412&end=1074","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3131612-5256b66a11b0a3b9def6ad9319bc4bde/thumbnail_412000.jpg","/articles/6260430/Clark-County/Kentucky/Fiscal-court-approves-multiple-budget-and-cash-transfers-amid-warnings-about-overspending","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6260430-a303d60c5dbdde131d22e38a13e0c375/orig.mp4?Expires=1770416523&Signature=KfP82fai8DCRgV~Ju4QSkIQBtDk19RkYOiId54JzMvHlqSKsZnER1kGt6kwqOHtvwIBJQ3oHXDMBJcEMIUnqRx~2wGkomHlQlxb5Ks~LUSYe1-W1tP-MgCG6ECrfGypoh~nkIHaXJCjhNdPjyR9~pd5oDljM3KLSd7wILpdPva4GDCQ4n3KJNXaZ-kYvi3f7381aIlMrLDimgbewyBzg59A7Gd7E8Xbu94BcjH0MLJ4P3pxMoz5BzhsCRnRxF-YB7LMsn9OTYEOwM~iY-Wxzf5s4O1ejAg7rWsxt~9~v5xuy9v3GUTXlruHG2REIv4tN7Vlrk2nYAXN-yqHt3FyXEw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Clark County Fiscal Court on an April meeting approved a set of budget and cash transfers intended to cover shortfalls in several departments after members warned that repeated transfers are unsustainable.

Judge and county finance staff presented three budget transfers and three cash transfers for approval. After discussion about how some expenses had been paid from ARPA-related accounts and whether appropriations had been moved correctly, members voted to approve the transfers. The court chair and finance staff said the transfers were needed to ensure payroll and vendor payments could be made before the next meeting.

Why it matters: Several magistrates and the judge expressed frustration that transfers have become routine. One commissioner said the transfers reflected “increasing appropriations” and warned that without firmer budgeting the county will continue to face cash-flow pressures and recurring midyear adjustments.

The court’s discussion covered: whether ARPA funds had been used or merely reclassified, how EMS and broadband line items should be funded, and whether contingency funds could be used directly for some payments. Finance staff explained that some amounts were already moved in cash and that the transfers were bookkeeping and appropriation moves needed to avoid missed payroll or vendor payments.

Officials also debated whether specific restricted accounts could be used. A question surfaced about a small LEPC account (Local Emergency Planning Committee) with roughly $500; staff and magistrates agreed LEPC monies are restricted to LEPC uses and cannot be moved to general operations. That point prompted a separate motion on a cash-transfer item tied to that account.

Court action: The court approved the three budget transfers and then approved the three cash transfers presented on the agenda. Members recorded aye votes and the motions carried.

Context and next steps: Multiple magistrates urged departments to live within their budgets and to avoid last-minute appropriations moves, saying the board will press for tighter controls in the next budgeting cycle. Finance staff said some transfers addressed timing differences that, if uncorrected, would cause immediate cash-flow problems.

Votes at the meeting also covered the bills list and supplemental bills; those were approved separately during the consent portion of the agenda.","Clark County Fiscal Court approved a package of budget and cash transfers after extended discussion about recurring appropriations increases, ARPA accounting, and constraints on certain restricted accounts.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Court reviews estimates for four road-slip repairs; FEMA reimbursement and timeline explained

Residents urge court to require traffic study and evening hearing on proposed high-capacity truck stop

Court approves payment of emergency contractor bills after debate over judge's emergency powers

Fiscal court approves multiple budget and cash transfers amid warnings about overspending