During the recent Iowa City School Board meeting held on April 22, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the district's 1-to-1 technology initiative, which aims to provide each student with a personal device for educational purposes. Parents, educators, and health professionals voiced their apprehensions about the potential negative impacts of increased screen time on students' academic performance, social skills, and overall well-being.

One parent, who identified as a disability advocate, emphasized the challenges faced by students who struggle with constant computer use. They highlighted the importance of maintaining traditional learning methods, such as handwriting, which fosters fine motor skills and emotional expression. The speaker argued that reliance on screens could hinder students' ability to engage with historical documents and develop critical communication skills.

Ashley Dorn, a university educator, echoed these concerns, arguing against the use of screens for content delivery in classrooms. She pointed to research indicating that comprehension and retention are significantly better when students engage with printed materials and human interactions. Dorn noted that her college students often lack essential academic skills, such as effective communication and research capabilities, which she attributed to their over-reliance on digital devices during their formative years.

David Norpier, another parent with a background in education, raised questions about the addictive nature of screens and their impact on students' attention spans. He urged the board to consider the physical and psychological effects of screen use, including digital eye strain and distractions that hinder learning. Norpier called for a more thorough examination of how these devices are utilized both in and out of school before committing to further funding for the program.

Sandy Hong, a community pediatrician, presented a strong case against the 1-to-1 initiative, citing fiscal and developmental concerns. She argued that young children should not be given personal devices, likening it to allowing them to drive a car without proper training. Hong warned of the rising rates of myopia linked to increased screen time and expressed concern over the growing incidence of anxiety and social isolation among children due to excessive device use.

The discussions during the meeting highlighted a growing consensus among parents and educators regarding the need for a balanced approach to technology in education. Many participants advocated for a return to more traditional teaching methods that prioritize face-to-face interactions and printed materials, suggesting that these strategies could better prepare students for academic success and personal development.

As the board considers the feedback from the community, the future of the 1-to-1 technology initiative remains uncertain. The meeting underscored the importance of addressing these concerns to ensure that educational practices align with the developmental needs of students, fostering an environment conducive to learning and growth.