California court committees enhance jury system with plain language instructions

April 25, 2025 | Judicial Council of California, Judicial, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

California court committees enhance jury system with plain language instructions
In a recent meeting of the Judicial Council of California, key discussions centered around enhancing the jury experience and improving jury instructions. Justice Adrian Grover, chair of the advisory committee on civil jury instructions, along with Judge Jeffrey Ross and Daryl Parker from the court executives advisory committee, presented updates aimed at making jury service more accessible and understandable for all participants.

The council emphasized the importance of jury service as a civic duty, highlighting that it allows citizens to engage directly with the justice system and the Constitution. To ensure that jurors from diverse backgrounds can participate effectively, the council is committed to simplifying the language used in jury instructions. This initiative is part of a broader effort to eliminate bias and enhance the overall juror experience.

Justice Grover noted that the transition to plain language jury instructions began with a blue ribbon commission on jury system improvement in 1997, which led to the establishment of a task force dedicated to this cause. The goal has been twofold: to maintain accuracy in legal expression while making the instructions more comprehensible. The council has released updated instructions twice a year, incorporating public feedback to refine the language further.

Examples of the changes were shared, illustrating the shift from complex legal jargon to straightforward language. For instance, a former instruction stating, "failure of recollection is common, innocent misrecollection is not uncommon," has been simplified to "people often forget things or make mistakes in what they remember." Such revisions not only clarify the law for jurors but also assist self-represented litigants in understanding their cases better.

Judge Ross highlighted the collaborative nature of the process, where attorneys and judges work together to ensure clarity and accuracy in the instructions. The council's commitment to continuous improvement reflects its dedication to fairness and justice within the judicial system.

As the meeting concluded, the council members expressed optimism about the ongoing efforts to enhance the jury experience, ensuring that all citizens can fulfill their civic responsibilities with confidence and understanding. The work of the Judicial Council continues to evolve, aiming to create a more inclusive and accessible legal system for everyone involved.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal