During the recent Judicial Council meeting on April 25, 2025, judges and council members expressed gratitude for the ongoing efforts to improve jury instructions and juror experiences in California courts. A key highlight was the discussion surrounding the California Criminal Jury Instructions (Calcrim), which have been instrumental in helping jurors understand their biases and engage more openly during trials.

Judge Ross emphasized the importance of addressing unconscious bias in jury instructions, noting that many jurors initially hesitate to acknowledge their biases. By framing these discussions in a more approachable manner, jurors feel more comfortable sharing their thoughts, which can lead to a more equitable trial process. This approach has been well-received, with judges reporting that it enhances communication and understanding among jurors.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the pilot program for juror compensation in Shasta County, which aims to alleviate financial hardships that can prevent diverse participation in jury duty. Judges noted a noticeable decrease in requests for financial hardship exemptions, suggesting that the program may be fostering greater socioeconomic diversity on jury panels. The judges expressed eagerness to see the data that will confirm these observations.

The council also discussed the ongoing work of the jury administration and management subcommittee, which continues to explore new ideas for enhancing the juror experience. However, it was noted that there has not been a new report or initiative since the task force on jury system improvements released its findings in 2004.

Overall, the meeting underscored the commitment of the Judicial Council to improve the jury system in California, with a focus on inclusivity and understanding, which ultimately benefits the community by ensuring fairer trials.