Indiana General Assembly passes expedited removal law for squatters

The Indiana Senate introduced Senate Bill 157 on April 24, 2025, during the First Regular Session of the 124th General Assembly. This legislative proposal aims to streamline the process for property owners to remove squatters from their premises, addressing a growing concern regarding unauthorized occupancy of residential and commercial properties.

The bill establishes a new chapter in the Indiana Code, specifically focusing on the expedited removal of squatters. A squatter is defined as an individual who occupies someone else's property without any rental agreement or permission from the property owner. Notably, the bill excludes individuals whose rental agreements have expired or those who have violated their agreements, as well as invitees on the property.

Key provisions of Senate Bill 157 allow property owners to file an affidavit asserting that a squatter is occupying their property. This affidavit serves as a formal declaration that can expedite the removal process, potentially reducing the time and legal complexities typically associated with eviction proceedings.

Debate surrounding the bill has highlighted concerns from various stakeholders. Proponents argue that the legislation provides necessary protections for property owners, enabling them to reclaim their spaces more efficiently. Critics, however, express worries about the potential for misuse, fearing that the expedited process could lead to wrongful evictions, particularly affecting vulnerable populations.

The economic implications of this bill are significant, as it could enhance property owners' rights and potentially deter unauthorized occupancy, thereby protecting property values. Socially, the bill raises questions about the balance between property rights and the rights of individuals who may find themselves in precarious housing situations.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts suggest that its passage could lead to increased scrutiny of eviction practices in Indiana. The outcome may set a precedent for how similar issues are handled in other states, particularly regarding the rights of property owners versus the rights of individuals facing housing instability.

In conclusion, Senate Bill 157 represents a pivotal shift in Indiana's approach to property rights and squatter removal. As discussions continue, the implications of this legislation will be closely monitored by both advocates and opponents, with potential long-term effects on housing policy in the state.