New Hampshire legislators debate House Bill 377 on gender-affirming treatment for minors

New Hampshire's Senate Health and Human Services Committee convened on April 23, 2025, to discuss House Bill 377, which seeks to restrict access to gender-affirming care for minors. The meeting highlighted significant concerns from various stakeholders regarding the implications of the proposed legislation.

One of the most pressing points raised was the potential infringement on parental rights. Advocates argued that the bill undermines the ability of parents and children to make informed medical decisions together. Testimonies emphasized that New Hampshire already has robust medical safeguards in place, ensuring thorough processes that include parental consent and the option to opt out at any time. Supporters of gender-affirming care pointed out that existing medical practices are designed to improve the quality of life for many children experiencing gender dysphoria.

The committee also heard from healthcare professionals, including representatives from Dartmouth Health, who expressed concerns about the clinical efficacy of the treatments affected by the bill. They warned that the legislation could disrupt care for existing patients and raised questions about the implications of tapering off medications for those currently receiving treatment. The potential criminalization of medical practices under the bill, which could classify violations as serious felonies, was met with strong opposition.

Additionally, the ongoing Supreme Court case, U.S. v. Skirmiti, which addresses constitutional issues surrounding gender-affirming care for minors, was cited as a reason for the committee to delay any decisions on the bill until the court's ruling is issued. Advocates for civil rights, including representatives from the ACLU of New Hampshire, argued that the bill could violate equal protection laws and fail to demonstrate a compelling government interest.

As discussions continue, the committee faces the challenge of balancing legislative action with the rights of families and the medical community's input. The outcome of this bill could have lasting implications for access to gender-affirming care in New Hampshire, making it a critical issue for many families in the state.