In a heated session of the House Appropriations Committee on April 23, 2025, lawmakers grappled with the contentious proposal to close Rainier School, a facility for individuals with severe disabilities. The discussion highlighted deep concerns over the lack of a comprehensive transition plan for residents, many of whom rely on specialized care that may not be available in community settings.

Representative Schmick opened the dialogue by sharing poignant feedback from parents of former residents, emphasizing the need for clear communication and support during transitions. He expressed worry that families were not adequately informed about placement options, leading to distress and uncertainty. "We have to learn from the past," he urged, advocating for a more thoughtful approach to care.

The debate intensified as Representative Caldier criticized the proposal, arguing that the voices of families and staff should take precedence over bureaucratic decisions. "We should be listening to the people that it affects the most," she stated, reflecting a sentiment echoed by several committee members who voiced skepticism about the state's ability to provide adequate care outside of institutional settings.

Representative Dye shared a personal story about his brother's care, underscoring the importance of dedicated support for the most vulnerable individuals. He warned that closing Rainier could lead to dire consequences, including increased mortality rates among residents who may not thrive in less structured environments. "This is deeply immoral at a level that will be corrosive to the character of our society," he asserted.

As the discussion unfolded, concerns about fiscal implications and the adequacy of community care options were raised. Representative Connors pointed out that the committee's responsibility is to ensure that residents have safe alternatives before any closures occur. "We have nowhere for them to go," she declared, calling for a pause on the bill until a solid plan is in place.

The session concluded with a strong call for a more comprehensive strategy that balances budgetary constraints with the moral obligation to care for individuals with disabilities. Lawmakers left the meeting with a clear message: the future of Rainier School and its residents remains uncertain, and the need for a thoughtful, inclusive approach to care is more critical than ever.