In a pivotal House Appropriations meeting on April 23, 2025, lawmakers grappled with the implications of proposed amendments affecting community support for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Representative Macri voiced strong opposition to an amendment, warning it could impose an unfunded mandate that jeopardizes essential community options. "We have an obligation to pass a budget that cares for the most vulnerable people in this state," she stated, emphasizing the need for adequate funding.

The discussion highlighted the stark reality that nearly ten times more individuals with IDD reside in community settings compared to state-run residential habilitation centers. Representative Penner echoed these sentiments, referencing Article 13 of the Washington State Constitution, which mandates state support for disabled individuals. He argued that failing to fund these services would contradict this constitutional obligation.

Representative Schmidt raised concerns about the lack of adequate placements for the most vulnerable, recalling the negative impacts on health experienced by individuals moved from established facilities. "Without a plan in place prior to doing this, we should not be going down this pathway," he cautioned.

Despite the urgency expressed by several representatives, the amendment aimed at ensuring legal compliance with state responsibilities was ultimately rejected. The committee then moved on to consider another amendment, proposed by Representative Burnett, which seeks to establish formal transition plans for residents affected by the closure of Rainier School.

As discussions continue, the fate of community support for individuals with IDD hangs in the balance, with lawmakers under pressure to ensure that vulnerable populations receive the care they need. The outcome of these deliberations will significantly impact the future of disability services in Washington State.