In a charged atmosphere at the Washington Legislature's House Appropriations meeting, a critical discussion unfolded regarding a bill aimed at shutting down a state-operated facility. The urgency of the matter was palpable as lawmakers grappled with the implications of the proposed changes on vulnerable individuals who rely on state support.

One lawmaker passionately criticized the bill, stating, "This bill is ready, fire, aim. It's in the wrong order." The sentiment echoed a growing concern that without a clear plan, the transition could leave many without necessary care. The speaker emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach, urging that if the state is committed to closing the facility, it must simultaneously ensure adequate funding for alternative placements.

The discussion highlighted the importance of expanding capacity in adult family homes and other living alternatives. "We buy market rate placement and fully fund programs," the lawmaker insisted, advocating for swift action to enhance staffing and facilities. The urgency was underscored by the looming deadline associated with the bill, which could potentially displace many individuals if not handled with care.

As the meeting progressed, the call for responsible funding became a central theme. "You can't fail to fund placements and carry out my duty to take care of those individuals at the same time," the lawmaker declared, emphasizing the moral responsibility of the legislature to protect those affected by the facility's closure.

The meeting concluded with a clear message: any legislative action must prioritize the well-being of individuals who depend on state services. The proposed amendment aimed to ensure that the bill not only addresses the closure but also commits to providing adequate support for those who will be displaced. As lawmakers continue to navigate this complex issue, the stakes remain high for the vulnerable populations at the heart of the discussion.