Senate Bill 2747 addresses misuse of Texas 380 economic development agreements

This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

In a recent meeting of the Texas Senate Committee on Economic Development, significant concerns were raised regarding the misuse of Chapter 380 economic development agreements, which are intended to stimulate local growth and attract private investment. The discussions centered around Senate Bill 2,747, introduced to address these challenges, particularly as they affect municipalities like Prosper and Georgetown.

The bill's proponent highlighted alarming trends where these agreements have been manipulated to redirect sales tax revenue from one city to another, undermining the original intent of fostering economic development. For instance, Prosper experienced a staggering $7 million loss in sales tax revenue due to a series of affiliated entities created to exploit these agreements. This situation arose when a major local business shifted its sales tax reporting to a different municipality, benefiting from a 75% rebate while the original community continued to provide services without any compensation for the lost revenue.

Mayor David Bristol of Prosper and Mayor Josh Schroeder of Georgetown both testified about the detrimental impact of these practices on their cities. They emphasized that the agreements, rather than generating new jobs or business activity, merely reclassified where sales were reported, effectively siphoning off funds from the communities that support these businesses. The mayors expressed concern that if left unchecked, such practices could lead to a race to the bottom, where cities might offer unsustainable tax incentives to attract businesses at the expense of their neighbors.

Senate Bill 2,747 aims to clarify the use of Chapter 380 agreements, ensuring they are utilized as intended—to promote genuine economic growth rather than merely shifting tax revenues. The bill does not eliminate these agreements but seeks to restore fairness and protect local tax bases.

The committee's discussions underscored the urgency of addressing these issues, as multiple municipalities are reportedly facing similar challenges. The potential implications of this bill extend beyond immediate financial concerns, touching on the broader principles of local tax fairness and economic integrity in Texas.

As the committee deliberates on the bill, the testimonies from local leaders highlight a critical moment for Texas municipalities, emphasizing the need for legislative action to safeguard local revenues and ensure that economic development tools serve their intended purpose. The bill remains pending, with further discussions anticipated in future sessions.

Converted from Senate Committee on Economic Development April 23, 2025 meeting on April 23, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI