[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6267447,"mediaKeyId","3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7","parentId",3070109,"title","Committee advances reviser's bill HB 2073 to the floor with due pass recommendation","audioSeconds",57,"startMs",1792140,"endMs",1849200,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7&start=1792&end=1849","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7/thumbnail_1792140.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6267447/Oregon/Committee-advances-revisers-bill-HB-2073-to-the-floor-with-due-pass-recommendation","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6267447-a67c09dabfc3b5ca7839b5cebb9c442a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770978541&Signature=LeiO7~O6CurYO0PKXpMJ7KJ3D1bquqzyLuCiOZFTTzaBbMZ4zGQxOIKN~H-C5p~CQ~t1SHy~dSZ1NM91MB3Sb1VyHuFhi8D6~G2X2pDanehc6YwO2pNr1fQXCBBhgiMmYqfKTSHDa56RlOg98mKwn2jICaXfzmcTxiYyecBHZzEoU9YxI~~f-ltCoYDy1xP2NNfp2TNq-wadR-QLc1tiO585D3Qc7pn-RxdTuG5j-LSJ7XLYMQmBG2cPnFQs3JblvUATuygRpHJG6EQH1IaHu-hKD1d~GTXP7zjweoGiRJB6ItUZf36mN0Mw6qTfam842HqaD4-hoTvM91X4w475LA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oregon Legislature","date","2025-04-21T00:00:00Z","article","The Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue held a work session on House Bill 2073, the annual reviser's bill, and moved the bill to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation on April 21.

\"House Bill 2,073, you heard last week it's the session's revisers bill,\" a committee staff member said, summarizing that the bill contains no policy changes and no revenue or fiscal impact. \"There are no policy changes in the bill. It's a series of it's a kind of a cleanup bill for the ORS. The paperwork is in all list. There is no revenue impact. The revenue impact statement is no impact and the fiscal impact statement is a no fiscal impact.\"

Vice Chair MacLean moved the bill to the floor with a due-pass recommendation. During the roll call the transcript records Chair Meek voting \"Aye,\" Senator Starr voting \"Aye,\" Vice Chair Flayn voting \"Aye,\" and Senator Taylor as excused. The chair announced the motion passes and designated a carrier for the bill to carry it to the floor.

Why it matters: The reviser's bill is routine housekeeping for the Oregon Revised Statutes and contains no policy changes or fiscal impacts according to committee staff; the committee's action advances the bill to the full Senate.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Committee On Finance and Revenue 04/21/2025 8:30 AM","oneSentenceSummary","House Bill 2073, the session reviser's bill with no policy or fiscal changes, was moved to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation and passed the committee roll call.","taxTitle","Finance and Revenue, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Oregon","taxId",17809,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6267452,"Committee hears Department of Revenue bill with technical and reporting changes; small revenue increase identified",0,1554260,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7&start=1554&end=1554","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7/thumbnail_1554260.jpg","/articles/6267452/Oregon/Committee-hears-Department-of-Revenue-bill-with-technical-and-reporting-changes-small-revenue-increase-identified","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6267452-6d439814b09142a503cebc5b32a38523/orig.mp4?Expires=1770978541&Signature=D928Uch4WaM86VExV-KdIOWHPkHlDG18jIkJir0c9G5wmyVCsL55gavv0nJH7MJdtMUmfmLRvE94yarqUliA5rzITNRmGphzfed7Qi4AJFv2H1fNscxZsQHFvK1CGafqqkanzAMryqZ7UWyYpbF4OSzZZ65TrPIfKvg95nqefdO7N3pch8h2-M2WnMoMdMGs5O~vBkjqBY1MGJJgAnaAycM0KhWoYhr7Wqvcyhs3KWBYNbFouWlsOk4ztcYesYTw5BTdWvqI99BZpcFLWOoRwL-S-e53FXsAqVaYVzFvqAt5o-zYqIqGnWkzjGAF~Py9k0P1PFA~NsF7hsYPZNbJ1w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Marjorie Taylor of the Oregon Department of Revenue summarized House Bill 2339 at a public hearing before the Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue on April 21, describing the measure as a package of minor and technical statutory changes and one small revenue effect.

\"Instead of proposing 5 separate bills, we just thought, gosh, let's give you 1 bill that makes some minor and technical changes to our existing statutes and programs,\" Marjorie Taylor said, and she invited committee questions and staff to assist on revenue details.

Taylor told the committee the bill updates timber severance fund balance and distribution calculations to align with a 2019 change; adds enforcement as a reason to share data in the marijuana and psilocybin programs with the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Oregon Health Authority and Department of Revenue; changes reporting requirements in sections 6 through 14 and requires the Department of Revenue to make recommendations; and contains a technical clarification that a credit is not used against S corporation minimum tax.

She also noted a small revenue impact related to the Oregon KIDs credit: adding foreign-earned income to the AGI calculation means fewer households qualify for the credit and produces an estimated increase of about $100,000 per biennium (approximately $70,000 per year).

Committee members asked whether the revenue impact was positive; Taylor replied, \"Positive,\" and staff confirmed the bill increases revenue.

The transcript record shows no committee vote on HB 2339; the public hearing was closed after the Department of Revenue testimony.

Why it matters: HB 2339 would make mostly technical statutory corrections and procedural changes across multiple programs administered or touched by the Department of Revenue, and it includes a small, positive revenue change tied to qualification for the Oregon KIDs credit.","House Bill 2339, sponsored by the Department of Revenue, would make technical changes to statutes including timber severance fund calculations, data sharing for marijuana and psilocybin programs, reporting requirements, and a small revenue increase of about $100,000 per biennium through AGI calculation changes.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6267457,"Senate committee hears testimony on bill to exempt up to $17,500 of military retirement pay for older veterans",371,27790,399520,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7&start=27&end=399","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3070109-567725110daa225f97c7825fda8e10b7/thumbnail_27790.jpg","/articles/6267457/Oregon/Senate-committee-hears-testimony-on-bill-to-exempt-up-to-17500-of-military-retirement-pay-for-older-veterans","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6267457-136fe83b0f3232f1469b701216b2dba0/orig.mp4?Expires=1770978541&Signature=IoYnWDKQS1YAH1M-iPbhG6HBzIaetuwgei0CL0ZmOIZ3Dkq7oZ-S1kWP8vtr7kZbejvsTFP6uFyBZbqE7cZdKka32htZykNxxxX5DOY~bIE7UhsFMYTYv1M29mxIwt5Zl1V-DxE~O04hhtcBFBppkyYeUDlp4JEHVXFut4hZpc5sp0LYVjA0ZhJXNe6GlX1AFop4qGKLB3VUtRxaUYxDH0c67Rot39A6hFFaEt~hE~rh8QNUwdmcySLopkwtuQx-GUr1Ip1w5GAb2ZXsc68GkTmZr-Vri-ZKoBYZ5LGFQCqC9xrYdf7ph9FynS5QnizcaD7I4aam9H3I9SvXnhk4GA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senator James Ivory Manning Jr. told the Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue on April 21 that Senate Bill 225A would create an Oregon personal income tax subtraction for military retirement income of up to $17,500 for taxpayers age 63 or older, indexed to inflation and applicable beginning tax year 2025.

\"This bill is something that I had been working on for a number of years and here's here's the reason why,\" Senator James Ivory Manning Jr. said, arguing the change would send a positive message to veterans and retirees and could encourage Oregonians who retired out-of-state to return. \"These are federal dollars that are being taxed for, pensions that have been earned by armed service personnel that have served 20 years or more on active duty.\"

The bill drew mixed public testimony. John Calhoun, representing Tax Fairness Oregon, said the average benefit—he estimated about $1,500 per year after phasing and eligibility—is too small to motivate retirees to move and warned the measure could cost the state an estimated $15 million to $17 million per biennium. \"Trying to compete with other states by handing out income tax exemptions to honored groups is a fool's errand,\" Calhoun testified. He also said the benefit is not targeted to veterans with disabilities, homelessness, or other high needs.

Marsha Kelly of the Oregon Women's Rights Coalition told the committee the state already provides many veteran supports—property tax exemptions for disabled veterans, veterans homes, workforce preferences and education benefits—and said the bill would risk opening demands for similar pension exemptions for other public employees. \"We have many, many things that we thank our veterans for in many programs,\" Kelly said. \"We think this is a bad idea because then, as Mr. Calhoun pointed out, you give a tax benefit to somebody, somebody else is gonna want it.\"

Timothy Cowan, Legislative Commission of the American Legion, Department of Oregon, spoke in support. He described volunteer and community contributions by veteran organizations and said the measure would reduce a deterrent to returning home for some veterans. \"It's more of a retention than it is an attraction,\" he said.

Committee members asked clarifying questions about the benefit amount and eligibility. Chair Meek noted the committee and Senator Manning have pursued similar measures previously. Vice Chair MacLean indicated support during the hearing, saying briefly, \"That's a good bill. Let's get you to vote twice.\" Senator Manning noted the bill had passed out of the Senate Committee on Veterans, Emergency Management, Federal and World Affairs unanimously.

No formal committee vote on SB 225A is recorded in the transcript; the record shows only the public hearing and closing of the hearing.

Why it matters: proponents called the bill a modest way to show appreciation and reduce a disincentive for veterans to return to Oregon, while opponents said the benefit is narrowly targeted, could cost millions, and could prompt calls for similar exemptions for other pensioned workers.

Votes at this hearing: none recorded for SB 225A. The public hearing closed and the committee moved on to other bills.","Senate Bill 225A would allow a personal income tax subtraction of up to $17,500 for military retirement pay for taxpayers age 63 and older, indexed to inflation and made applicable beginning tax year 2025; supporters called it a modest gesture to retain veterans, opponents said it is a poorly targeted tax cut.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Committee advances reviser's bill HB 2073 to the floor with due pass recommendation

Committee hears Department of Revenue bill with technical and reporting changes; small revenue increase identified

Senate committee hears testimony on bill to exempt up to $17,500 of military retirement pay for older veterans