This article was created by AI using a key topic of the bill. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the full bill. Link to Bill
On April 22, 2025, the District of Columbia Senate State Legislature introduced Council Bill 260224, a comprehensive piece of legislation aimed at reforming the secondary ticket market. The bill seeks to address consumer protection issues and promote fair practices in ticket sales, particularly in the wake of rising concerns over ticket scalping and inflated prices.
Key provisions of Council Bill 260224 include capping the resale price of tickets at the original price plus an additional 10%, effectively limiting profit margins for resellers. The bill also bans the sale of speculative tickets—those sold without a guarantee of availability—aiming to protect consumers from purchasing tickets that may not exist. Furthermore, it mandates that any reseller selling 50 or more tickets annually must register with the Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection, ensuring accountability and transparency in the market.
The legislation emphasizes “all-in” pricing, requiring clear disclosure of total ticket costs upfront, and outlines specific conditions under which refunds must be issued. It also prohibits ticket issuers from restricting ticket transferability unless such terms are disclosed prior to purchase. Additionally, the bill imposes technological requirements on ticket issuers and secondary platforms to prevent automated systems from circumventing purchase limits.
Notably, the bill has garnered support from various stakeholders, including I.M.P., which operates several prominent local venues, and the National Independent Venue Association. These organizations advocate for fair ticketing practices that benefit both consumers and local businesses.
Debate surrounding the bill has focused on its potential impact on the secondary market and the balance between consumer protection and the rights of ticket resellers. Some opponents argue that the cap on resale prices could discourage investment in ticket inventory, while proponents assert that it will enhance accessibility for consumers.
The bill carries significant implications for the local economy, particularly for the entertainment sector, as it seeks to create a more equitable environment for ticket sales. If passed, Council Bill 260224 could reshape the landscape of ticket purchasing in the District, ensuring that consumers are better protected from exploitative practices.
As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders will be closely monitoring discussions and potential amendments to the bill, which could influence its final form and effectiveness in addressing the challenges within the ticketing industry.
Key provisions of Council Bill 260224 include capping the resale price of tickets at the original price plus an additional 10%, effectively limiting profit margins for resellers. The bill also bans the sale of speculative tickets—those sold without a guarantee of availability—aiming to protect consumers from purchasing tickets that may not exist. Furthermore, it mandates that any reseller selling 50 or more tickets annually must register with the Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection, ensuring accountability and transparency in the market.
The legislation emphasizes “all-in” pricing, requiring clear disclosure of total ticket costs upfront, and outlines specific conditions under which refunds must be issued. It also prohibits ticket issuers from restricting ticket transferability unless such terms are disclosed prior to purchase. Additionally, the bill imposes technological requirements on ticket issuers and secondary platforms to prevent automated systems from circumventing purchase limits.
Notably, the bill has garnered support from various stakeholders, including I.M.P., which operates several prominent local venues, and the National Independent Venue Association. These organizations advocate for fair ticketing practices that benefit both consumers and local businesses.
Debate surrounding the bill has focused on its potential impact on the secondary market and the balance between consumer protection and the rights of ticket resellers. Some opponents argue that the cap on resale prices could discourage investment in ticket inventory, while proponents assert that it will enhance accessibility for consumers.
The bill carries significant implications for the local economy, particularly for the entertainment sector, as it seeks to create a more equitable environment for ticket sales. If passed, Council Bill 260224 could reshape the landscape of ticket purchasing in the District, ensuring that consumers are better protected from exploitative practices.
As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders will be closely monitoring discussions and potential amendments to the bill, which could influence its final form and effectiveness in addressing the challenges within the ticketing industry.
Converted from Council Bill 260224 bill
Link to Bill
Comments
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill