In a move aimed at bolstering livestock protection, the Montana Legislature has introduced House Bill 767, which seeks to establish a per capita license fee for goat owners to fund predatory animal control efforts. Introduced on April 18, 2025, the bill addresses growing concerns among goat producers regarding the impact of predatory animals on their livestock.

The primary purpose of HB 767 is to create a sustainable funding mechanism for predatory animal control programs at the county level. Under the proposed legislation, owners of goats aged one year and older will be required to pay a license fee, the amount of which will be determined by the county board of commissioners. This fee will be collected by the county treasurer and will be used to establish a dedicated predatory animal control fund. The fund will finance various control measures, including bounties for predatory animals, which have become a significant concern for goat farmers in the region.

Key provisions of the bill include the establishment of a lien on the property of those who fail to pay the license fee, ensuring that the county can recover costs associated with predatory animal control. Additionally, the bill stipulates that any proceeds from the sale of furs and skins from predatory animals captured through these efforts will also be deposited into the fund, further supporting the program's financial sustainability.

The introduction of HB 767 has sparked notable debate among stakeholders. Supporters, particularly from organized associations of goat producers, argue that the bill is essential for protecting their livelihoods and ensuring the viability of goat farming in Montana. They emphasize the need for a coordinated approach to managing predatory animals, which can pose significant threats to livestock.

Opponents, however, raise concerns about the potential financial burden on goat owners, particularly smaller producers who may struggle to absorb additional costs. Critics also question the effectiveness of such programs, citing past instances where similar measures did not yield the desired outcomes in controlling predatory populations.

The implications of HB 767 extend beyond the agricultural community. Economically, the bill could enhance the viability of goat farming in Montana, potentially leading to increased production and sales in the livestock sector. Socially, it reflects a growing recognition of the challenges faced by farmers and the need for legislative support to address these issues.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. If passed, it could set a precedent for similar funding mechanisms in other agricultural sectors facing predation challenges. The Montana Legislature's decision on HB 767 will be closely watched, as it could significantly impact the state's agricultural landscape and the livelihoods of its farmers.