[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":44,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6579762,"mediaKeyId","3045600-c923f8522859d0b9913cb62124b4e00f","parentId",3045600,"title","Forest Lake board approves four summer meeting dates after debate over weeknight change","audioSeconds",0,"startMs",2023000,"endMs","viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045600-c923f8522859d0b9913cb62124b4e00f&start=2023&end=2023","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045600-c923f8522859d0b9913cb62124b4e00f/thumbnail_2023000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6579762/Minnesota/Forest-Lake-board-approves-four-summer-meeting-dates-after-debate-over-weeknight-change","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6579762-cf25e7977208f55c31a89811d4d812eb/orig.mp4?Expires=1771132720&Signature=geQAgzK7eOkie0cUnscQ2bcLAPha51DaLA6ytTtgmW8RfKQ1LJ~0I-AThwVarZ1FDjaOi1IRm2tSFth1M6-uW-jr1nWz45Z78JPPBdLpm8gplsLyNvZChL5hRbB3bWcG0UeBWdx~OQnK~bLhM0diPB3H6Fl~ooOOlgVZmdtep8JS3od96ijGk3p7qsm3ZENlhRwA0yWejD9r66Egj7HJpF-YS-J3VqVkBk9u93hTjMrS6zCOQQf46z5vzwcv9xXQWgz1Ez-llaCKC~4s4BNzzYMITodw~FX7fX96WxzhMIB330W7j34CkcR0BAwu2edU4D-kaxKrFQBDau2JsWuqjg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Forest Lake Public School District","date","2025-04-18T01:23:59.71Z","article","The Forest Lake Area Schools Board of Education approved four school-board meeting dates for 2025-26 on April 17 while postponing a final decision on the full calendar and potential weekday changes.

Board members debated whether to move regular meetings away from Thursday evenings, citing conflicts with youth athletics, concerts and other community events. Some members favored keeping Thursday for agenda-preparation timing and public access; others said moving to Monday or Tuesday could increase committee and public participation.

After multiple motions and an unsuccessful attempt to postpone consideration, the board approved an amendment to the calendar that cleared four dates for the near term: June 26, July 17, Aug. 7 and Aug. 21. The board voted to defer approval of the remaining dates until a later meeting; administrators were asked to return with options showing what the calendar would look like if meetings were scheduled on Monday or Tuesday to inform the May 1 discussion.

Other formal actions at the meeting included routine consent items and a motion to recess into closed session to discuss labor-relations strategy for classified staff positions.

Votes at a glance

- Approval of meeting agenda: motion carried by voice vote (no roll-call tally recorded).
- Motion to allow two non-agenda presenters (Rotary Interact): approved by voice vote.
- Consent agenda: approved by voice vote.
- Approval (amended) of 2025-26 school-board meeting calendar: board approved four dates (June 26; July 17; Aug. 7; Aug. 21) by voice vote; the board directed administration to return with options for rescheduling weekday nights and to bring remaining calendar dates back for decision.
- Motion to enter closed session on labor relations strategy for classified staff: approved by voice vote.

Why it matters: The weekday chosen for board meetings affects public participation, committee attendance and school families' ability to attend. Board members asked for additional analysis of Monday- and Tuesday-night options so the board can weigh community conflicts and committee participation before adopting a full calendar.

What the board asked for next: Administrators will prepare a comparison of the calendar as proposed and alternate schedules with meetings on Monday or Tuesday for discussion at a future meeting (administration indicated a May 1 follow-up).","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","April 17, 2025 - School Board Meeting of Forest Lake Area Schools","oneSentenceSummary","After extended discussion about whether to move regular board meetings off Thursday nights, the Forest Lake board approved four dates for 2025-26 (June 26, July 17, Aug. 7 and Aug. 21) and postponed finalizing the full calendar to a later board meeting; the board also approved consent items and entered closed session on labor relations.","taxTitle","FOREST LAKE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, School Boards, Minnesota","taxId",65366,"location","Minnesota","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_46":81,"_48":82,"_50":83,"_52":84,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":85,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":86,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6579766,"Forest Lake board hears public plea to exempt small student clubs as policy overhaul is discussed",1661,138000,1799000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045600-c923f8522859d0b9913cb62124b4e00f&start=138&end=1799","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045600-c923f8522859d0b9913cb62124b4e00f/thumbnail_138000.jpg","/articles/6579766/Minnesota/Forest-Lake-board-hears-public-plea-to-exempt-small-student-clubs-as-policy-overhaul-is-discussed","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6579766-e20254829b49cf2da6df4f54b868dd37/orig.mp4?Expires=1771132720&Signature=nXApbnYacv3ZPGaVDtdHk3rnnAQJeierTFD7kRuU5UBr6GyMm7LoxePXnHBSJFLSEEhVu7UrjGWvGrQdfRCYwdSjEzj1ygSGutTrihd0TTh8yw-E4bPvSxmPDDdlKhmqQCYGspRzzhvnEdtqz5~rXfCvua-RWu8QqfRPlE4RfgZ-xUIYzKe5x28KVsz7fCzXaON3WBZnRQGizw9MJWbo~1WxhLO~PDqX8-12pATSoud2~pfyjJI5od3BT-vYpeuTKQRv6p4p1HJQ68Of-HcwQGEwwFlJ1pVeGfqk9cKA6qOflRPDZiBkPGqcwel75JoUx6~wcQfDjkx0BtLLl~~Yww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Forest Lake Area Schools board members spent a large portion of their April 17 meeting debating a proposed rewrite of the district's long-standing student-club policy and heard two public commenters ask the board to protect small, student-run groups.

The board's policy director said the district is considering replacing the brief existing policy (File 507) with two policies modeled on Minnesota School Boards Association (MSBA) language: one to govern school-sponsored activities and one to preserve a limited open-forum for student-led clubs. The proposed limited-open-forum language references federal equal-access protections and would allow student groups to meet on campus without implying school sponsorship, the director said.

The policy discussion attracted public comment from members of the Forest Lake Rotary Interact Club and a local Rotary officer. \"My name is Susan Young. I'm coming to you tonight as president of the Forest Lake Rotary,\" Susan Young told the board. She urged the board to consider how a new threshold in the draft policy would affect small clubs that are \"student run\" and provide community service, including a military-care-package drive the Interact Club runs with local partners.

Jackson A., a Forest Lake High School senior and president of the Interact Club, described the club's activities and volunteer record: \"We are a student led service organization under the guidance of our Forest Lake rotary club. ... We've sent over 5,000 pounds of goods over the 6 years. We've raised over $25,000,\" Jackson said, and estimated the club's contributions and donations over time at about $50,000.

Board members and administrators traced the proposal to MSBA model policies and federal law. Under the draft approach discussed at the policy committee, student groups could remain in a \"limited open forum\" (the board's description of Equal Access Act protections) or petition to become school-sponsored if they meet criteria tying them to curriculum or extracurricular sponsorship. The draft also included an administrative suggestion: a minimum membership threshold of 1% of a building's student body at the time of application. The board was told that at the current high school a 1% threshold would be about 17 students.

Board members and administrators acknowledged the trade-offs. Supporters of a threshold said a small minimum helps limit the administrative burden of approving and supervising numerous ad-hoc groups; critics, including speakers from Rotary and board members who spoke in discussion, said a rigid 1% cutoff could exclude small but active student groups. \"We may have to tweak that or tune that a little bit,\" a board speaker said when the 1% figure was raised; another board member suggested removing the 1% requirement altogether and leaving discretion to building principals in the application process.

Several administrators and school principals who participated in the committee conversation emphasized that building principals would be the on-the-ground reviewers for petitions to change a group's status; board members asked administrators to return with additional procedural language so principals could evaluate petitions consistently. The board also noted that middle-school groups may need separate consideration; the draft under discussion focused primarily on secondary schools.

The policy rewrite remains under discussion; the board did not take a final vote on the club policies at the April 17 meeting. Directors and members said they expected additional revision and further committee meetings before presenting final language to the full board.

Why it matters: The policy would determine whether small, student-organized groups are treated as school-sponsored activities (which can carry staff involvement and resource commitments) or remain independent, limited-open-forum groups protected by federal equal-access law. The decision affects which groups can use facilities, receive supervisory support, or be listed in district materials.

Looking ahead: Directors said they will continue policy committee work and consult principals on thresholds and supervisory procedures before the district returns a revised draft to the board.","Board members discussed replacing a brief student-club policy with two MSBA-based policies that would separate school-sponsored clubs from limited open-forum, student-led organizations; members of the Rotary Interact Club and Rotary International urged exceptions for small, student-led groups that fall below a proposed 1% membership threshold.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Forest Lake board approves four summer meeting dates after debate over weeknight change

Forest Lake board hears public plea to exempt small student clubs as policy overhaul is discussed