[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6268712,"mediaKeyId","3050660-65ac28f3fbfc1f4020698791682dbbc6","parentId",3050660,"title","Senators debate labeling vs. ban for cell‑cultured and alternative protein products; Conrad offers labeling amendment","audioSeconds",4714,"startMs",6097000,"endMs",10811000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3050660-65ac28f3fbfc1f4020698791682dbbc6&start=6097&end=10811","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3050660-65ac28f3fbfc1f4020698791682dbbc6/thumbnail_6097000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6268712/Nebraska/Senators-debate-labeling-vs-ban-for-cellcultured-and-alternative-protein-products-Conrad-offers-labeling-amendment","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6268712-8445c43b1c6721bdc208d824a1fbf466/orig.mp4?Expires=1771030636&Signature=jrwoYZJ4cyJ4K0ODPZkX1PfFgAHXztyo0Tk2NeqIUorit~-b0kSuQSY6068bb~xs0BN8h~17M7b31OzsyPizI-5LqrD-gX63-krotNniFtqKBR4iSPksWrUm8rTx18EQDSR4fBU1GEMuhigbAMDXp2-OA6v-a8kPSjc1yVDPE1OkNoWiglmUKEfxiq5Buhht1-e-Y-TmuVR5NL3y5xLY0OTTYNqFck98~P8jEB7RpAwH0GUIJy93MftyJLI6JUUHcARGRaDUscKBd8fPWLBoxmDgWqh0-8Mca0~leDlc3PCDTySbvx2s3KfQ8aQGyhh4~28k-lMDpoAI9p4Fo1cQyw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Nebraska Legislature","date","2025-04-17T00:00:00Z","article","Senator Conrad offered AM882 to replace LB246 with a labeling‑focused approach under the Nebraska Pure Food Act, prompting an extended floor debate about whether the state should ban cell‑cultured or other alternative “meat” products or instead require clear consumer labeling.

“AM882 would amend the Nebraska Pure Food Act to establish labeling and advertising requirements for manufactured protein foods,” Senator Conrad said when she introduced the amendment, describing it as a consumer‑education approach that mirrors measures adopted by neighboring states.

Supporters of the labeling approach—Senator John Kavanaugh, Senator Dungan and several others—argued the market and labeling requirements provide a middle ground that preserves consumer choice while ensuring transparency. “People have a right to know what they’re buying,” Senator John Kavanaugh said on the floor, endorsing labeling over an outright ban.

Opponents urged greater caution or a moratorium. Senator DeKay (State Senator) and others raised questions about incomplete safety data, possible contamination risks in scaled production, and whether existing research is sufficient to call these products safe for mass consumption. Some senators referenced reports and reviews from the UK Food Standards Agency and the World Health Organization noting gaps in empirical data on nutritional profiles, stability and allergy risks.

Additional practical concerns surfaced in debate: market viability and investor activity, regulatory oversight, and how restaurants would disclose the presence of cultured products. Senator Raybould cited investment trends and examples of start‑ups scaling back, noting AgFunder data showing a sharp decline in funding for cultivated‑meat startups in 2023 compared with earlier peaks.

Sponsor Conrad and others said labeling gives the state a flexible option: if future evidence shows cultured products are safe and commercially viable, laws can be adjusted. Several senators described AM882 as a “consumer‑education” policy that many agriculture stakeholders support, while others preferred an explicit moratorium pending robust safety studies.

No final floor vote on AM882 or on LB246 was recorded in the transcript excerpt; debate continued across multiple speakers and the day’s business concluded with other items on the agenda.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Legislative Morning Session 4/17/2025","oneSentenceSummary","Senator Conrad offered AM882 to amend the Nebraska Pure Food Act so manufactured protein foods—cell‑cultured, plant‑based and insect‑sourced meat analogs—must be clearly labeled; the proposal prompted floor debate over a labeling approach versus an outright ban or moratorium.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature NE, Nebraska","taxId",77675,"location","Nebraska","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6268717,"Nebraska Legislature advances bill to reduce teacher retirement contributions after tense debate over timing and budget use",8869,1200000,10069000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3050660-65ac28f3fbfc1f4020698791682dbbc6&start=1200&end=10069","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3050660-65ac28f3fbfc1f4020698791682dbbc6/thumbnail_1200000.jpg","/articles/6268717/Nebraska/Nebraska-Legislature-advances-bill-to-reduce-teacher-retirement-contributions-after-tense-debate-over-timing-and-budget-use","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6268717-18957ad918671d4c39b6b5100e894b6b/orig.mp4?Expires=1771030636&Signature=EzCQl~4QBYBOJr2ZvOvXzxhuPnkfhETsxH9DK32-LNhDcRPOX7L7wbYCPSK8RFWjHB88~FOCx8LdHALEznnaI-ouDeS88tQ55g7YMBQsIQpTa1Prm02666XB8m6YjVKI1O9nFQdVVSelDgEM5WfstyylHpYPG~6Kd6tAVCHlXaSkzpCg8T~CmGvkqGTQXrYr8PHUNvzrpBbskHMo1A8nhKcHZRvJ24UrnvnIe7jEqf1pIlnH90wUNgh6EyIbWQ-2wnlHjjXeZq-AciQiYDqovt0ExJenZJW3tU3QJXz08nqmTIZLqO9w3RaeaiqqArIx689IH0ZlHImuN3R-WbsRqQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senators adopted a committee amendment to Legislative Bill 645 on a 41-0 vote and advanced the bill to E&R initial after floor debate over whether the measure should be rushed to help close a state budget shortfall.

The bill, carried by Senator Ballard (State Senator), would reduce state, employer and employee contribution rates to the School Employees Retirement System when actuarial funded ratios exceed specified thresholds and automatically restore higher rates if the funded ratio falls, according to the committee amendment distributed on the floor.

Supporters said the plan is a cautious, actuarially-backed way to ease contributions while protecting long-term solvency. “Teachers are gonna see a significant increase in take home pay,” Senator Ballard said on the floor, summarizing the amendment’s phase-down of contribution rates and the automatic triggers if funding declines. Ballard told colleagues the system was 99.91% funded as of the July 1, 2024 valuation and projected to exceed 100% in the near term.

Opponents and some undecided senators objected to the process and timing. Senator Conrad (State Senator) and others said parts of the package and a select-file amendment filed the day before had not yet been subjected to public hearing and that legislative leaders were moving the measure in large part to produce budget savings ahead of the Appropriations Committee’s work. “We should not rush with something this important,” Conrad said, arguing stakeholders had not had adequate time to weigh policy and fiscal impacts.

Floor debate included policy and process arguments. Senators who support the amendment described it as prudent fiscal management of an overfunded plan with built-in protections: if the funded ratio falls below 96%, state and other contribution rates would increase automatically under the amendment. Supporters also noted teacher take-home pay would increase immediately if the projections hold. Critics highlighted market volatility and urged a public hearing on the recently filed select-file amendment before the body votes on final changes.

On procedural motions earlier in the debate, Senator Conrad moved to bracket LB645 until April 24; that bracket motion failed on a floor record of 7 ayes and 29 nays. The committee-reported bill was advanced after adoption of the committee amendment AM876, which Ballard introduced and described as negotiated with education stakeholders including school administrators and associations.

What happened next: AM876 was adopted (41-0) and LB645 was advanced to E & R initial. The transcript records the retirement committee reported the bill out 4-0. Sponsors said a select-file amendment addressing additional benefits is scheduled for public hearing next week; several senators asked for a clear fiscal accounting of how much of the budget shortfall the bill is expected to cover.

The legislature will consider the select-file amendment and any additional fiscal notes in subsequent stages; senators can still debate and amend the bill before final passage.

Votes at a glance:
• Adoption of committee amendment AM876 — 41 ayes, 0 nays (adopted).
• Bracket motion to April 24 — 7 ayes, 29 nays (failed).
• Retirement Committee reported LB645 — 4 yes, 0 no (committee report).
• Advancement of LB645 to E & R initial — recorded as 38 ayes, 0 nays on the floor record.

The bill remains on the legislative calendar for further action on select and final stages; sponsors said they expect additional hearings on amendments and will circulate actuarial reports and fiscal details to members.","Lawmakers adopted a committee amendment to LB645 that ties reduced state, employer and employee contributions for the School Employees Retirement System to actuarial funding levels; adoption and advance to select file followed a floor debate about whether the measure is being used to balance the state budget without full public hearings.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senators debate labeling vs. ban for cell‑cultured and alternative protein products; Conrad offers labeling amendment

Nebraska Legislature advances bill to reduce teacher retirement contributions after tense debate over timing and budget use