The Nebraska Legislature's recent session on April 15, 2025, was dominated by discussions surrounding Legislative Bill 632, which addresses the handling of fetal remains after elective abortions. Senator Hansen introduced the bill, emphasizing its aim to ensure that healthcare facilities either cremate or bury the remains in a humane manner. This proposal has sparked significant debate among lawmakers.
Senator Spivey, who previously attempted to indefinitely postpone the bill, argued that it imposes unnecessary burdens on abortion procedures and could be seen as a backdoor ban on abortion. He highlighted concerns that the bill would retraumatize victims of sexual assault and push a specific religious ideology, asserting that abortion providers are already compliant with existing laws regarding fetal remains.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The committee amendments to LB 632 were discussed, which would make it unlawful for healthcare facilities to dispose of fetal remains in any manner not prescribed by the bill. Senator Hardin, advocating for the amendments, called for support, while Senator Spivey reiterated his opposition, citing constitutional concerns and the potential impact on victims of sexual violence.
Spivey pointed out that the bill could violate Nebraska's constitutional amendment that protects abortion access under certain circumstances, arguing that it would effectively limit options for those needing procedural abortions. He described the legislation as a "trap law," which could force patients into less desirable options for abortion care.
As the session progressed, the debate over LB 632 highlighted the ongoing tensions surrounding reproductive rights in Nebraska, with lawmakers grappling with the implications of the proposed legislation. The outcome of this bill could significantly affect access to abortion services in the state, making it a critical issue for both lawmakers and constituents alike.