Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Conference committee reviews amendments to House Bill 1218 on economic analysis threshold

April 15, 2025 | House of Representatives, Legislative, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Conference committee reviews amendments to House Bill 1218 on economic analysis threshold
The North Dakota Legislature's conference committee on House Bill 1218 convened on April 15, 2025, to discuss amendments and implications surrounding the bill, which focuses on economic analysis requirements for state-funded drainage projects.

During the meeting, committee members reviewed proposed changes that would allow the state water commission to bypass economic analysis for projects expected to cost less than $1 million. This threshold has been a point of contention, with some members advocating for a lower limit to ensure thorough assessments of state fund usage. Senator Engadin questioned the significance of the $1 million mark, suggesting that a lower threshold would provide better oversight. In response, it was noted that the $1 million figure has been part of the code for several sessions, and the current proposal aims to streamline the process while still allowing for future studies to refine this threshold.

The committee also discussed the historical context of project costs, revealing that approximately half of the projects fall under the $1 million mark. This statistic was supported by data indicating that since 2019, a significant number of completed projects were below this threshold.

Concerns were raised by Senator Gearhart regarding the elimination of economic analysis altogether, suggesting that this could lead to potential misuse of funds. He emphasized the importance of maintaining some level of scrutiny to prevent manipulation of project costs.

In a move to enhance legislative oversight, an amendment was proposed to assign the study of these projects to legislative management rather than the state water commission. This change aims to ensure that the legislature remains involved in the evaluation process.

The committee ultimately voted to attach the proposed amendments to the bill, with a majority in favor, while acknowledging the need for further discussions in future sessions. The meeting concluded with plans to reschedule for continued deliberation on the bill's provisions.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI