North Dakota State's Attorneys voice concerns over proposed legislative changes on obscenity laws

In a recent meeting of the North Dakota House Appropriations Committee, significant concerns were raised regarding the fiscal impact of proposed legislation on the state's attorneys. Jonathan Byers, representing the North Dakota State's Attorneys Association, highlighted that the new bill would require state attorneys to take on roles they currently do not fulfill, such as conducting investigations and determining the obscenity of materials, which could lead to increased workloads and costs.

Byers explained that most state attorneys operate as small offices, often with just one attorney and minimal support staff. The proposed changes would necessitate hiring additional prosecutors to handle cases, as ethical rules prevent attorneys from serving as both witnesses and prosecutors in the same case. This dual role could strain resources in small counties, where state attorneys already juggle multiple responsibilities.

The discussion also touched on the lack of prior consultation with state attorneys during the bill's development, raising questions about the practicality of its implementation. Byers urged the committee to reconsider the bill, citing the potential for increased financial burdens on local governments and the ethical dilemmas it would create for state attorneys.

In addition to the primary discussion on the bill, the committee briefly addressed budget considerations for various state agencies, including the ethics commission. The meeting concluded with a recess, allowing for further deliberation on agency funding.

As the committee continues its discussions, the implications of this proposed legislation on local governance and community resources remain a critical concern for residents and officials alike. The outcomes of these deliberations will likely shape the operational landscape for state attorneys across North Dakota.