Crown Castle defends wireless site application against public concerns in network build-out review

The Sustainability & Infrastructure Commission meeting held on April 9, 2025, in San Mateo focused on critical discussions regarding a proposed wireless service project. The meeting addressed various concerns raised about the application submitted by Ground, a telecommunications provider.

The first significant topic discussed was related to the technical objectives of the proposed network. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the network map, which allegedly did not include Verizon sites, and the absence of before-and-after visual representations of the project. Critics argued that the drive tests necessary to validate the network's effectiveness were not conducted, leading to claims of misleading information.

In response, Ground asserted that they had met all application requirements as mandated by federal law. They emphasized that providers are not obligated to demonstrate a coverage gap to justify their projects. Ground highlighted that the proposed site would enhance their network by introducing 5G spectrum and increasing service capacity.

City staff responded to the concerns by clarifying that there are no specific review criteria related to network build-out. They noted that the applicant's description of the project as aimed at providing wireless service and increasing capacity was valid. Furthermore, they stated that the application did not require a drive test to be performed, and the construction plans provided sufficient information for understanding the design.

Additional points of contention included claims that photo simulations used in the application were misleading, as they did not accurately depict the view from homes near the proposed site. Concerns were also raised about the validity of engineer licenses and the outdated noise report. Staff confirmed that the engineer's licenses were valid at the time of signing and that the photo simulations were adequate for assessing the visual impact of the project. They also clarified that there was no home directly in front of the proposed site.

The meeting concluded with a reaffirmation of the project's objectives and the regulatory framework guiding the application process. The commission will continue to monitor the situation as further developments arise.