Connecticut updates registration requirements for community association managers

On April 8, 2025, the Connecticut State Legislature introduced Substitute Bill No. 1357, a legislative measure aimed at regulating community association managers in the state. This bill seeks to establish a formal registration process for individuals acting as community association managers, addressing concerns about accountability and professionalism in the management of community associations.

The primary provisions of Senate Bill 1357 require individuals seeking to become registered community association managers to submit a detailed application to the Department of Consumer Protection. This application must include personal information, a declaration regarding felony convictions, and a fee structure that includes a $60 application fee and a $100 registration fee. Notably, the bill mandates a state and national criminal history records check for applicants, ensuring that only qualified individuals are entrusted with the management of community associations.

Exemptions from registration are also outlined in the bill. Certain professionals, such as licensed attorneys, certified public accountants, and insurance producers, are excluded from the registration requirement when providing professional services. Additionally, members of an association who manage their own community, provided they do not control a significant majority of the votes, are also exempt.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among stakeholders, including community association members, property management professionals, and legal experts. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance the integrity of community management, protect residents, and ensure that managers are held to a higher standard of conduct. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential financial burden on new managers and the implications of increased regulation on the housing market.

The economic implications of Senate Bill 1357 could be significant. By establishing a regulated framework for community association management, the bill may lead to improved property values and community satisfaction, as residents gain confidence in the management of their associations. Conversely, the added costs and regulatory hurdles could deter potential managers from entering the field, potentially leading to a shortage of qualified professionals.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to balance the need for regulation with the concerns of those who fear overreach. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for how community associations are managed in Connecticut, influencing both current practices and future legislative efforts in the realm of property management.