[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6086766,"mediaKeyId","2894307-25eaba99fc952ccd218c7a5cea1f25e6","parentId",2894307,"title","Cedar Rapids school board holds public hearing on FY2026 certified budget; resident warns rightsizing could harm at‑risk students","audioSeconds",1152,"startMs",93000,"endMs",1245000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2894307-25eaba99fc952ccd218c7a5cea1f25e6&start=93&end=1245","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2894307-25eaba99fc952ccd218c7a5cea1f25e6/thumbnail_93000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6086766/Iowa/Cedar-Rapids-school-board-holds-public-hearing-on-FY2026-certified-budget-resident-warns-rightsizing-could-harm-atrisk-students","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6086766-102a864cf8983c253a58488c9ba47c4a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771186227&Signature=fGOgwC4rfOR2~zBtXPRBVJRZmcB5wKMBmLjQ3XG7VcQBnLpVPbNk0Rl2NUNSuB8xRt2eC7kNAynUibqbosPWDjCsLb2IgZoKXbJn09spUwZnS7X49NUFVaKbir0eYjJh3-kLRCnhzKEjPtAFub8Nmhvz6-bZ5h3xZkqHRPbHkfPIIW1mMj-cm5STw0TcMlI-qLxzoVv9fSRx7qCalIOURN1F7g4-CpgkHrub7lveje5voy~sJMQvY7m9Sxz~giDSmICn9Tz6bk7ZtSG~rxv96mY9AVuzecwR6RGuPQ00yESWJeOwWf8V9nnKr3L~TE5Rchicwn9RKpww~TzXw57bEw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Cedar Rapids Comm School District","date","2025-04-08T11:21:55.687Z","article","The Cedar Rapids Community School district Board of Education held a special meeting April 7, 2025, and conducted a public hearing on the district's proposed fiscal year 2026 certified budget. Business-services staff member Carla presented the budget assumptions and projections; one public commenter, Kaylee Muhlbauer, told the board the district's rightsizing model would harm at‑risk students.

Carla said the district is “using a 2% supplemental state aid rate, for the certified budget,” and reviewed how that assumption affects projected new money, enrollment impacts and the property-tax rate. She told the board the notice published in the Gazette on March 26 showed a current estimated tax rate of $13.65 and referred to a maximum tax-rate notice of $13.84. Carla said the district is estimating about $2,400,000 in unadjusted new money under a 2% SSA assumption and that net open enrollment out and enrollment declines reduce that amount.

In public comment, Kaylee Muhlbauer urged the board to consider how staffing “rightsizing” would affect students the Iowa Administrative Code labels at risk. Muhlbauer recited the code definition and said the district’s proposed at‑risk ratio of 15 to 1 is too high compared with the National Dropout Prevention Center guidance and would reduce opportunities for one‑on‑one connections. “The right sizing model does not support at risk students and their ability to succeed in school and beyond,” she said, adding that students have reported increased anxiety and statements that they may not return to school.

Carla summarized revenue assumptions and fund actions the budget incorporates: maintaining a $13,000,000 management-fund levy, reserving $45,000,000 in SAVE/PPEL bond sales to support high‑school projects (which she said is borrowing against those funds and “is not an increase or an ask to property taxes”), estimated insurance savings from plan changes, and use of the general fund balance as a bridge year while ESSER federal dollars expire. On the expenditure side the district included estimated negotiated settlements, staffing realignments, and operational reductions; Carla said the current fiscal-year deficit estimate had decreased from an earlier estimate and that the district currently projects a roughly $2,560,000 surplus for FY2026 under the assumptions presented.

Board members pressed staff for additional detail on open-enrollment out and on the supplemental state aid (SSA) timeline. One board member noted SSA “was supposed to be determined more than 60 days ago, by law,” and said the delay makes staffing and negotiation planning difficult; Carla asked the board and community to “please reach out to state and local representatives, let them know how important it is” to set SSA in a way districts can plan. The board closed the public hearing and was told it will consider adopting and certifying the budget at the April 28 board meeting ahead of the April 30 statutory deadline.

The public hearing produced no final vote on adoption; board action to adopt the certified budget is scheduled for a future meeting. The public comment on rightsizing and multiple board requests for additional enrollment and open‑enrollment detail are scheduled for follow up as the budget process continues.

Ending: The board closed the hearing and continued other business on the April 7 agenda; the adoption and certification vote is scheduled for April 28, 2025.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Special Board of Education Meeting - April 7, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Cedar Rapids Community School district Board of Education held a special meeting April 7, 2025, and conducted a public hearing on the district's proposed fiscal year 2026 certified budget.","taxTitle","Cedar Rapids Comm School District, School Districts, Iowa","taxId",12924,"location","Iowa","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6086760,"Survey finds 41% support for $210.6 million Cedar Rapids bond plan; district to refine proposal and hold more outreach",1207,1425000,2632000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2894307-25eaba99fc952ccd218c7a5cea1f25e6&start=1425&end=2632","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2894307-25eaba99fc952ccd218c7a5cea1f25e6/thumbnail_1425000.jpg","/articles/6086760/Iowa/Survey-finds-41-support-for-2106-million-Cedar-Rapids-bond-plan-district-to-refine-proposal-and-hold-more-outreach","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6086760-f8e92e544ee9e3960447cb69520e3ea3/orig.mp4?Expires=1771186227&Signature=aarinFYLXjLCjrq-L7bXQV~dXIVM6-rOO9XjdGVRYvRzHRm6NkWR7mZRiWBjbLXfAxpWVpjIiEUvAbbnppys~Be2guW4t~AbuJA7QbU1IgsfIVzId6veoFDdorRIRqJ3Vjd1In13PvYknKIaG-okQ-kjEDjpQiBAxcRad99RtyUnxVk6mv5iup2qVRA4xtCTEO0FOzRVcxM~5lZjNMj4e7YZmUWk8mYMkUoZhGQenluAd6GQ4hc6ethRI8otWDxD6ffSSSP4q3cLsZQgKNrfL-ertquf5VxYMIMr3Zau4sbHCJCAseMi4BZpyHCJmMvAwKQEXkI-BoxYT35uS85~Ig__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Cedar Rapids Community School District staff presented results at the April 7 special Board of Education meeting from a districtwide bond survey and a companion poll by the Economic Alliance. School Perceptions project manager Darren Sievers told the board the vendor received 7,850 responses and that the districtwide composite result for the proposed $210.6 million bond plan was 41% in favor, 15% undecided and 44% opposed.

Sievers said the School Perceptions approach seeks broad participation rather than a small random sample and reported a statistical margin of error of “plus or minus 1.13.” He gave a breakdown of support by stakeholder group: 52% of staff respondents said they would probably or definitely vote yes, 51% of parents said they would probably or definitely vote yes, and 36% of non‑parent/non‑staff respondents said they would probably or definitely vote yes.

District staff and consultants described the bond plan elements presented to respondents: renovation of McKinley, renovation of Wilson, a new middle school on the northeast side, Kennedy High School freshman academy and commons renovation, and additional work to prepare Roosevelt to receive students if other changes proceed. Staff said the plan’s estimated cost is approximately $210,600,000 and noted a projected long‑term operations savings figure presented to the task force and community; staff said the district could reclaim roughly $26,000,000 in PPEL funding for Roosevelt renovation if the bond passes as proposed.

The Economic Alliance poll produced different results: staff said the Alliance found roughly 55% of respondents likely or definitely to vote for a plan when asked additional, targeted questions; staff cited higher support when safety and ADA accessibility were presented as primary focus areas. Board members asked for further disaggregation of results by geography, age and respondent type; Sievers and district staff said they can provide additional cross‑tabs and a themed analysis of the roughly 2,000+ free‑form comments collected.

Board discussion and the consultants’ findings led staff to outline next steps: further focus groups with parents, teachers and neighborhood groups; refining the bond plan based on feedback; a board review on April 28 with potential selection of language on May 12; signature gathering and public information beginning May 13 and continuing through November 3 if the board advances a referendum; and a possible bond vote on November 4. Staff said they expect a community “yes” committee to form separately as a private advocacy group if the board places a question on the ballot.

Ending: Consultants and staff emphasized additional outreach to raise awareness among non‑parent voters, who make up the majority of registered voters in the district; the board directed staff to return with refined options and deeper analysis before any decision to place a referendum on the ballot.","District consultants presented results of a survey of 7,850 respondents showing 41% support, 15% undecided and 44% opposed to the proposed $210.6 million bond. Staff said the district will continue focus groups, refine options and return to the board with proposed ballot language in April/May.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Cedar Rapids school board holds public hearing on FY2026 certified budget; resident warns rightsizing could harm at‑risk students

Survey finds 41% support for $210.6 million Cedar Rapids bond plan; district to refine proposal and hold more outreach