Collin County citizens urge halt on third party election tools amid security concerns

In a recent meeting held on April 7, 2025, the Collin County Commissioners Court addressed significant concerns regarding the use of third-party tools for ballot redaction in upcoming elections. The discussions highlighted the tension between compliance with state directives and the security of election processes, raising questions about the integrity of the tools being considered.

One of the primary topics was the necessity of using a third-party company for ballot redaction, as mandated by the Secretary of State. Concerns were voiced about the implications of sharing sensitive voter data with external entities. A commissioner expressed apprehension about the potential risks associated with the chosen company, particularly its ties to political organizations and its public statements regarding election integrity. This prompted a call for a thorough review of the company’s background to ensure that Collin County does not inadvertently invite security vulnerabilities into its election process.

Chuck Reynolds, a concerned citizen, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for caution. He referenced previous cybersecurity issues with election tools, citing expert testimony that highlighted vulnerabilities in even government-certified systems. Reynolds urged the commissioners to reconsider the decision to adopt new third-party tools, advocating instead for a return to hand-marked paper ballots, which he argued provide a more reliable method of voter verification.

The meeting also touched on the broader implications of these discussions, particularly the need for transparency and security in the electoral process. As the commissioners deliberated on the purchase of the ballot redaction tool, the importance of maintaining public confidence in election integrity was underscored.

In conclusion, the meeting revealed a critical juncture for Collin County as it navigates the complexities of election security and compliance. The discussions raised essential questions about the balance between adhering to state mandates and ensuring the safety of voter data. As the commissioners move forward, the community will be watching closely to see how these concerns are addressed in the upcoming elections.