Committee votes 9-2 to disapprove renewable natural gas proposal in heated discussions

On April 4, 2025, the Building Code Council convened a significant meeting to discuss the implications of renewable energy regulations, particularly focusing on the treatment of renewable natural gas (RNG) in comparison to renewable electricity. The discussions highlighted the ongoing debate about how to equitably assess different energy sources within the state's regulatory framework.

A key point of contention arose around the proposal to amend the duration for which renewable energy credits (RECs) would be valid. Some council members argued for consistency in how RNG is treated alongside other renewable sources, such as solar energy. Greg Johnson emphasized the need for uniformity, suggesting that both RNG and solar panels should be evaluated on the same basis, despite concerns that neither directly reduces energy consumption.

The meeting also saw a motion to disapprove a proposal that would have altered the current regulations governing these energy sources. This motion sparked a lively debate, with members expressing disappointment over the limited opportunity for discussion and potential amendments to the proposal. Gary, a council member, voiced frustration about the process, indicating that the debate was prematurely cut off, which hindered the chance to refine the language of the proposal.

As the meeting progressed, attempts were made to reach a compromise that would allow for the inclusion of RNG while maintaining the original 15-year validity period for RECs. However, the motion to disapprove ultimately passed with a vote of 9 to 2, alongside two abstentions. This decision reflects the council's current stance on the matter, leaving the future of RNG regulations uncertain.

The outcome of this meeting is significant as it underscores the complexities of integrating renewable energy sources into existing frameworks. The council's decision may have lasting implications for the natural gas industry and the broader renewable energy landscape in Washington. Moving forward, stakeholders will likely continue to advocate for clearer guidelines and equitable treatment of all renewable energy sources as the state navigates its energy transition.