The Senate Ways & Means Committee convened on April 4, 2025, to discuss significant housing legislation, including engrossed House Bill 12 17 and third substitute House Bill 14 91. The meeting featured a range of testimonies from stakeholders, reflecting diverse perspectives on the proposed bills.

The first major topic of discussion was House Bill 12 17, which aims to address the intertwined issues of housing security and food insecurity. Advocates from various coalitions expressed strong support for the bill, emphasizing that rising housing costs are a primary driver of food bank reliance among low-income individuals. They argued that the legislation is crucial for protecting tenants struggling to make ends meet and urged the committee to pass the bill as it stands.

Conversely, several opponents of the bill voiced their concerns. David Pitkin, a property management CEO, argued that the bill would exacerbate rent increases rather than stabilize them, claiming it imposes undue risks and costs on housing providers. He warned that such measures could lead to higher rents and reduced availability of rental properties.

Zetine, a long-time Seattle resident, shared a personal account of how increasing taxes and government regulations have negatively impacted her ability to maintain her home. She cautioned that further controls would diminish individual freedoms and push residents out of the city.

Marilyn Yim, a small landlord, echoed these sentiments, stating that the bill would deter investment in housing and worsen the housing crisis. She highlighted the financial strain on small landlords and the potential for reduced rental housing availability due to increased operational costs.

In contrast, Jake Garcia, representing the Latino Community Fund, spoke in favor of the bill, citing the high percentage of rent-burdened Latino families. He argued that the legislation would provide necessary relief to communities facing housing insecurity.

The public hearing concluded after an hour, with the committee chair thanking all participants for their input. The committee will continue to consider the implications of House Bill 12 17 and will move on to discuss House Bill 14 91 in subsequent sessions. Written testimonies from those unable to speak in person will be accepted until 1:30 PM the following day.