Idaho committee votes to explore alternatives to CANS assessment for child welfare

In a significant move during the Joint Finance-Appropriation Committee meeting on March 25, 2025, Idaho lawmakers approved new language that will impact behavioral health funding and assessments for children. The committee unanimously consented to a proposal that introduces restrictions on appropriations related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, as well as critical race theory and transgender ideology programs.

The approved language also mandates the Department of Health and Welfare to explore alternatives to the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) assessment. This assessment is crucial for determining the resources and services available to children based on their individual needs and disabilities. The decision to require a report on alternatives stems from concerns raised by parents and counselors regarding the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity questions in the assessment, which some believe may deter families from seeking necessary services.

Representative Tanner, who moved to accept the new language, emphasized that the intent is not to eliminate the CANS assessment but to investigate other options that do not include controversial questions. This exploration aims to address the concerns of parents who feel uninformed about the assessment's implications for their children.

However, the discussion was not without dissent. Some committee members expressed worries that the proposed changes could undermine the effectiveness of the CANS assessment, which has been developed with input from families and stakeholders. They cautioned against making decisions without fully understanding the assessment's structure and purpose, highlighting the importance of including parental feedback in the legislative process.

Despite these concerns, the committee proceeded with the vote, reflecting a desire to advance the budget and address behavioral health funding promptly. The implications of this decision will likely resonate throughout Idaho's health and welfare services, as the state seeks to balance fiscal responsibility with the needs of its diverse population. As the Department of Health and Welfare prepares to report on alternative assessments, stakeholders will be watching closely to see how these changes unfold and affect the delivery of services to children in need.